Tag Archives: sa66คาสิโน

BGC ices gambling talk on football social media sites


The UK Betting and Gaming Council (BGC) is asking football clubs to refrain from discussing and promoting gambling on their social media sites in as part of an effort to avoid triggering problem gamblers. It’s move that may seem extreme to the layman, but will likely help keep UK gambling operators a step ahead of UK gambling regulators.
Guidelines for how football clubs should handle discussions of gambling were sent out by the BGC late last week and utilize a plea from 50 former gambling addicts to make the case. They pointed out that seeing their favorite club site promoting gambling caused them “distress” and “encouraged” them to place wagers.
As an effort to avoid these triggering moments, the BGC is recommending that football clubs refrain from promoting gambling operators or bonus offers and their “organic tweets”. This is a nod to the reality that gambling offers are ubiquitous on social media and that no one is really more than a click or two away from them on the internet anyways.
BGC officials sent a letter detailing the new code of conduct to 11 football clubs, as well as to social media operators.
In a statement reported on by SBC News, Brigid Simmonds OBE, Chairman of the BGC described the importance of the new standards saying, “Our members rightly have a zero tolerance approach to gambling by under-18s, so as an industry we are understandably concerned that children may be exposed to betting adverts on social media platforms. Our new guidelines make clear the standards expected of football clubs when they post gambling promotions on social media, and I look forward to them being put into practice as soon as possible.”
The BGC guidelines are not legally binding, but members of the BGC who wish to remain in good standing are expected to abide by them.
The post BGC ices gambling talk on football social media sites appeared first on .

แทงบอล
บาคทร่า
คาสิโน
คาสิโนออนไลน์
แทงหวย

Posted in Online Casino News, Sports Betting, UK Gambling News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

PokerStars Rolls Out New LSNG Leaderboard Promotion, Tetris + Spin & Go

PokerStars has rolled out Tetris + Spin & Go, a temporary takeover of their ultra-popular lottery sit and go game with a new theme and a lucrative new promotion for players.

F5poker first revealed that PokerStars was working on such a promotion back in September 2020. On Monday, it deployed globally on most licenses on the global dot-com pool as well the European shared liquidity network of Spain, France and Portugal.

The Spin and Go lobby in the client has been redesigned with a Tetris aesthetic, as have the tables. The game itself remains unchanged—fast, winner-takes-all sit and gos with a random top prize.

What is new is the promotion on top: Tetris-themed leader boards. While the mechanics are fairly complicated—it involves Line Clears, Levels and Game Scores—it boils down to daily player rankings where cash prizes are given out to the highest volume players.

For players that fall outside the cash prizes, the operator has a $5000 daily prize draw for players that finished in the top 500.

In total, the operator says that over $1.5 million will be paid out in the dot-com market and almost as much—€1 million—in the Southern European market from now until the end of March. This works out at over $33,000 daily in dot-com, and €23,000 in Southern Europe.

It appears to replace the previous long-running Spin & Go 20 and 50 leader boards. This had given away just over $20,000 a week and had run throughout much of 2020.

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Criticisms of Michael Slepian’s Stanford study on poker tells and hand movements (published 2015)


Some places the study was featured.
The following is reposted from a 2015 piece I wrote for Bluff magazine. It was originally located at this URL but has become unavailable due to Bluff going out of business. I saw this study mentioned recently in Maria Konnikova’s book ‘The Biggest Bluff’ and was reminded about this piece and noticed it was offline, so I wanted to share it again. A few notes on this piece:

The original title below and was more negative-sounding than I liked; Bluff chose it. Also, if I could rewrite this piece now, I’d probably choose less negative-sounding phrasing in some places. 
Regardless of the exact factors that might be at work in the found correlation, I realize it’s scientifically interesting that a significant correlation was found. But I also think it’s possible to draw simplistic and wrong conclusions from the study, and my piece hopefully gives more context about the factors that might be at work.
Image on left taken from Michael Slepian’s media page.

The Slepian Study on Betting Motions Doesn’t Pass Muster
A 2013 study¹ conducted at Stanford University by graduate student Michael Slepian and associates found a correlation between the “smoothness” of a betting motion and the strength of the bettor’s hand. In a nutshell, there was a positive correlation found between betting motions perceived as “smooth” and “confident” and strong hands. The quality of the betting motions was judged by having experiment participants watch short clips of players making bets (taken from the 2009 WSOP Main Event) and estimate the hand strength of those bets.
This experiment has gotten a lot of press over the last couple years. I first heard about it on NPR. Since, I’ve seen it referenced in poker blogs and articles and in a few mainstream news articles. I still occasionally hear people talk about it at the table when I play. I’ve had friends and family members reference it and send me links to it. It’s kind of weird how much attention it received, considering the tons of interesting studies that are constantly being done, but I guess it can be chalked up to the mystique and “sexiness” of poker tells.

The article had more than casual interest for me. I’m a former professional poker player and the author of two books on poker behavior: Reading Poker Tells and Verbal Poker Tells. I’ve been asked quite a few times about my opinion on this study, and I’ve been meaning to look at the study more closely and write up my thoughts for a while.
In this article, I’ll give some criticisms of the study and some suggestions for how this study (and similar studies) could be done better. This isn’t to denigrate the work of the experiment’s designers. I think this is an interesting study, and I hope it will encourage similar studies using poker as a means to study human behavior. But I do think it was flawed in a few ways, and it could be improved in many ways.
That’s not to say that I think their conclusion is wrong; in fact, in my own experience, I think their conclusion is correct. I do, however, think it’s a very weak general correlation and will only be practically useful if you have a player-specific behavioral baseline. My main point is that this study is not enough, on its own, to cause us to be confident about the conclusion.
I’ll give a few reasons for why I think the study is flawed, but the primary underlying reason is a common one for studies involving poker: the study’s organizers just don’t know enough about how poker works. I’ve read about several experiments involving poker where the organizers were very ignorant about some basic aspects of poker, and this affected the way the tests were set up and the conclusions that were reached (and this probably applies not just to poker-related studies but to many studies that involve an activity that requires a lot of experience to understand well).
Poker can seem deceptively simple to people first learning it, and even to people who have played it for decades. Many bad players lose money at poker while believing that they’re good, or even great players. In the same way, experiment designers may falsely believe they understand the factors involved in a poker hand, while being far off the mark.
Here are the flaws, as I see them, in this study:
1. The experimenters refer to all WSOP entrants as ‘professional poker players.’
This first mistake wouldn’t directly affect the experiment, but it does point to a basic misunderstanding of poker and the World Series of Poker, which might indirectly affect other aspects of the experiment and its conclusions.
Here are a couple examples of this from the study:
The World Series of Poker (WSOP), originating in 1970, brings together professional poker players every year (from the study’s supplemental materials)
These findings are notable because the players in the stimulus clips were highly expert professionals competing in the high-stakes WSOP tournament.
The WSOP Main Event is open to anyone and most entrants are far from being professional poker players. Categorizing someone’s poker skill can be difficult and subjective, but Kevin Mathers, a long-time poker industry worker, estimates that only 20% of WSOP Main Event entrants are professional (or professional-level) players.
This also weakens the conclusion that the results are impressive due to the players analyzed being professional-level. While the correlation found in this experiment is still interesting, it is somewhat expected that amateur players would have behavioral inconsistencies. I’d be confident in predicting that a similar study done on only video clips of bets made by professional poker players would not find such a clear correlation.
2. Hand strength is based on comparing players’ hands
This is a line from the study that explains their methodology for categorizing a player’s hand as ‘weak’ or ‘strong’:
Each player’s objective likelihood of winning during the bet was known (WSOP displays these statistics on-screen; however, we kept this information from participants by obscuring part of the screen).
They relied on the on-screen percentage graphics, which are displayed beside a player’s hand graphics in the broadcast. These graphics show the likelihood of a player’s hand winning; it does this by comparing it to the other players’ known hands. This makes it an illogical way to categorize whether a player believes he is betting a weak or strong hand.
If this isn’t clear, here’s a quick example to make my point:
A player has QQ and makes an all-in bet on a turn board of Q-10-10-8. Most people would say that this player has a strong hand and has every reason to believe he has a strong hand. But, if his opponent had 10-10, the player with Q-Q would have a 2.27% chance of winning with one card to come. According to this methodology, the player with the Q-Q would be judged as having a weak hand; if the test participants categorized that bet as representing a strong hand, they would be wrong.
It’s not stated in the study or the supplemental materials if the experimenters accounted for such obvious cases of how using the percentage graphics might skew the results. It’s also not stated how the experimenters would handle river (last-round) bets, when one hand has a 100 percent winning percentage and the losing hand has 0 percent (the only exception would be a tie).
It’s admittedly difficult to come up with hard-and-fast rules for categorizing hand strength for the purposes of such an experiment. As someone who has thought more than most about this problem, for the purpose of analyzing and categorizing poker tells, I know it’s a difficult task. But using the known percentages of one hand beating another known hand is clearly a flawed approach.
The optimal approach would probably be to come up with a system that pits a poker hand against a logical hand range, considering the situation, or even a random hand range, and uses that percentage-of-winning to rank the player’s hand strength. If this resulted in too much hand-strength ambiguity, the experiment designers could throw out all hands where the hand strength fell within a certain medium-strength range. Such an approach would make it more likely that only strong hand bets and weak hand bets were being used and, equally important for an experiment like this, that the player believed he or she was betting either a strong or weak hand.
3. Situational factors were not used to categorize betting motions
When considering poker-related behavior, situations are very important. A small continuation-bet on the flop is different in many ways from an all-in bet on the river. One way they are different: a small bet is unlikely to cause stress in the bettor, even if the bettor has a weak hand.
Also, a player making a bet on an early round has a chance for improving his hand; whereas a player betting on the river has no chance to improve his hand. When a player bets on the river, he will almost always know whether he is bluffing or value-betting; this is often not the case on earlier rounds, when hand strength is more ambiguous and undefined.
This experiment had no system for selecting the bets they chose for inclusion in the study. The usability of the clips was apparently based only on whether the clip meant certain visual needs of the experiment: i.e., did the footage show the entirety of the betting action and did it show the required amount of the bettor’s body?
From the study:
Research assistants, blind to experimental hypotheses, extracted each usable video in each installment, and in total extracted 22 videos (a standard number of stimuli for such studies; Ambady & Rosenthal, 1993) for Study 2 in the main text.
Study 1 videos required a single player be in the frame from the chest-up, allowing for whole-body, face-only, and arms-only videos to be created by cropping the videos. These videos were therefore more rare, and the research assistants only acquired 20 such videos.
The fact that clips were chosen only based on what they showed is not necessarily a problem. If a hand can be accurately categorized as strong or weak, then it doesn’t necessarily matter when during a hand it occurred. If there is a correlation between perceived betting motion quality and hand strength, then it will probably make itself known no matter the context of the bet.
Choosing bets only from specific situations would have made the experiment stronger and probably would have led to more definite conclusions. It could also help address the problem of categorizing hand strength. For example, if the experiment designers had only considered bets above a certain size that had occurred on the river (when all cards are out and there are no draws or semi-bluffs to be made), then that would result in polarized hand strengths (i.e., these bets would be very likely to be made with either strong or weak hands).
Also, the experiment’s method for picking clips sounds like it could theoretically result in all strong-hand bets being picked, or all weak-hand bets being picked. There is nothing in the experiment description that requires a certain amount of weak hands or strong hands. This is not in itself bad, but could affect the experiment in unforeseen ways.
For example, if most of the betting motion clips chosen were taken from players betting strong hands (which would not be surprising, as most significant bets, especially post-flop, are for value), then this could introduce some unforeseen bias into the experiment. One way this might happen: when a video clip shows only the betting motion (and not, for example, the bettor’s entire torso or just the face, as were shown to some study groups), this focus might emphasize the bet in the viewer’s mind and make the bet seem stronger. And if most of the hands-only betting clips were of strong-hand bets (and I have no idea how many were), the study participants watching only the hand-motion betting clips would falsely appear to be making good guesses.
My main point here is that thinking about the situational factors of a betting motion, and incorporating that into the experiment in some way, would have resulted in less ambiguity about the results. (It appears that it was difficult to find usable clips from a single WSOP event; in that case, the experimenters could just add footage from another WSOP Main Event to the study.)
4. The number of chips bet was not taken into account
The experiment designers did not take into account the chips that were bet. In their words:
During betting, each player pushes poker chips into the center of the table. Each chip has a specific color, which indicates a specific value. These values range from $25 to $100,000. This range of chip values has a crucial consequence for the current work. The number of chips does not correlate with the quality of the hand (see Table 1A in the main text). Players could move a stack of 20 chips into the center of the table, and this could be worth $500 or $2,000,000 (the winner of the 2009 WSOP won $8,547,042, thus the latter bet magnitude is a bet that can be made in the WSOP). Because no participants were professional poker players, nor considered themselves poker experts, they were not aware of chip values. They could not, then, use the number of chips as a valid cue to judge poker hand quality.
It’s true that your average person would not know what the chip colors at the WSOP Main Event mean. But it seems naïve to think that seeing the chips being bet couldn’t possibly have an effect on the experiment.
For one thing, the number of chips being bet could bias a participant to think a bet was stronger or weaker, whether correctly or incorrectly. What if all the strong-hand bets in the study were also bets that involved a lot of chips? (This is not implausible because smaller bets with weak hands are common early in a hand, when bets are small, whereas larger bets later in the hand are more likely to represent strong hands.) And what if some of the study participants were able to deduce (consciously or unconsciously) the strength of the bet from the number of chips?
Also, it’s possible that some of the test participants were knowledgeable (consciously or not) about some WSOP chip colors and what their denominations were. Or they were able to deduce (consciously or not), from the arrangement and number of chips, what the chip values were. (For example, large denomination chips are generally required to be kept at the front of a player’s stack.)
Again, this could have been addressed by selecting bets taken only from specific situations and only of certain bet sizes. If all bets chosen were above a certain bet size, and this was communicated to the study participants, then this would have lessened the impact of the chips being able to be seen.
5. Quality of “smoothness” was subjective
The experiment was based on the perceptions of study participants watching the assembled video clips. It was not based on objective measurements of what constitutes “smoothness” of a betting motion. This was a known issue in the experiment:
Thus, both player confidence and smoothness judgments significantly predicted likelihoods of winning, which suggests that movement smoothness might be a valid cue for assessing poker hand quality. It is unknown, however, how participants interpreted “smoothness” or whether the players’ movements that participants rated as smooth were truly smoother than other players’ movements. Other physical factors, such as speed, likely played a role.
This is not a major criticism; I think using perception is a fine way to find a correlation, especially for a preliminary study. But I think it does mean that we have no reason to be confident in the idea that smoothness of betting motion is correlated with hand strength. If there is are correlations between betting motion and hand strength (which I believe there are), these could be due to other aspects of arm motion or hand motion, such as: the betting speed, the position of the hands, the height of the hand, or other, more obscure, factors.
In summary
Again, I don’t mean to denigrate the experiment designers and the work they’ve done. I think this was an interesting experiment, and I think it’s probable the correlation they noticed exists (however weak the correlation may be).
Also, as someone who is very interested in poker behavior, I’d love to see similar studies be done. My main goal in writing these criticisms and suggestions was to emphasize that poker is complex, as is poker behavior. There are many behavioral factors in a seemingly simple hand of poker and taking these factors into account can make an experiment stronger and the results more conclusive.
Patricia Cardner, PhD, EdD, is a poker player and the author of Positive Poker, a book about the psychological characteristics of professional poker players. She had this to say about poker’s use in scientific studies:
“While researchers often have the best of intentions, it is difficult for them to fully understand the nuances of poker. Researchers who reach out to poker players for help can make more informed decisions about the research areas they choose to pursue, increase reliability and validity, and improve the overall quality of their results and conclusions.”
¹: Slepian, M.L., Young, S.G., Rutchick, A.M. & Ambady, N. Quality of Professional Players’ Poker Hands Is Perceived Accurately From Arm Motions. Psychological Science (2013) 24(11) 2335–2338.

Related

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

Posted in hand movement, Poker Tells, Psychology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

การเปิด City of Dreams ในทะเลเมดิเตอร์เรเนียนล่าช้าไปจนถึงปี 2565


เผยแพร่เมื่อ: กุมภาพันธ์ 15, 2021, 10:16 น. ปรับปรุงล่าสุด: 15 ก.พ. 2564 10:37 น. การเปิด City of Dreams Mediterranean ถูกเลื่อนออกไปจนถึงปี 2565 เนื่องจากผลกระทบจากการก่อสร้างที่เกิดจาก COVID-19 การก่อสร้างยังคงดำเนินต่อไปที่ City of Dreams Mediterranean ภาพนี้ตั้งแต่เดือนมกราคม 2564 แสดงสถานะของโครงการ COVID-19 ชะลอการเปิดรีสอร์ทตามแผนตั้งแต่ปลายปี 2564 เป็นไตรมาสที่ 3 ของปี 2565 (ภาพ: City of Dreams Mediterranean) เตรียมจะกลายเป็นรีสอร์ทคาสิโนที่ใหญ่ที่สุดในยุโรป Financial Mirror รายงานว่า บริษัท แม่ของ City of Dreams Mediterranean Melco รีสอร์ทได้รับการยืนยันเมื่อสัปดาห์ที่แล้ว Phidias Pilides รองประธานของ Cyprus Gaming and Supervision Commission ได้แจ้งต่อรัฐสภาไซปรัสว่าคาสิโนมีเป้าหมายในไตรมาสที่สามของปี 2565 สำหรับการเริ่มต้น การพัฒนา 550 ยูโร (667 ล้านดอลลาร์) เดิมมีกำหนดเปิดให้บริการในปลายปีนี้ Pilides เปิดเผยว่า Melco Resorts กำลังประสบกับความล่าช้าของห่วงโซ่อุปทานที่เกิดจากไวรัสโคโรนา เป็นผลให้การก่อสร้างดำเนินไปในอัตราที่ช้าลงมาก Cyprus Gaming Recovery แม้จะมีการปฏิเสธ City of Dreams ในการต้อนรับแขกที่มาเยือนไซปรัส Melco บอกกับเจ้าหน้าที่ของประเทศหมู่เกาะเมดิเตอร์เรเนียนว่าปี 2564 จะยังคงเป็นปีที่ดีสำหรับอุตสาหกรรมการท่องเที่ยวและเกม ในขณะที่มีการสร้างรีสอร์ทคาสิโนแบบบูรณาการมากกว่าครึ่งหนึ่งพันล้านดอลลาร์ Melco ได้เปิดคาสิโนผ่านดาวเทียมชั่วคราวในลีมาซอลรวมถึงสถานที่เล่นเกมผ่านดาวเทียมในนิโคเซียลาร์นากาปาโฟสและเอเยียนาปา ใบอนุญาตการพนันของ Melco สำหรับ City of Dreams มีอายุ 30 ปีและรวมถึงการผูกขาดการพนันในช่วง 15 ปีแรก ใบอนุญาตเริ่มต้นในปี 2560: แม้ว่า COVID-19 จะทำลายรายได้จากการเล่นเกมขั้นต้น (GGRs) ในคาสิโนในปี 2020 เนื่องจากพวกเขาถูกบังคับให้ปิดการดำเนินการตามคำสั่งซื้อจากรัฐบาล แต่ Melco คาดว่าการเล่นเกมจะกลับมาดำเนินการได้อย่างรวดเร็ว คาสิโนที่เปิดใหม่บางส่วน เราได้เห็นความต้องการเกมภายในที่กลับมาอย่างรวดเร็วซึ่งทำให้รายได้จากการเล่นเกมในไตรมาสที่สามของเรากลับมาอยู่ที่ประมาณ 75 เปอร์เซ็นต์ของระดับปีที่แล้ว “Lawrence Ho ซีอีโอของ Melco กล่าวในการโทรครั้งสุดท้ายของนักลงทุนของ บริษัท การฟื้นตัวและการเติบโตที่เร็วขึ้น ในกลุ่มเกมระดับพรีเมียม” นายโฮกล่าวเสริม ไซปรัสว่าจ้าง Spree ComingMelco Resorts กล่าวว่าภายในสิ้นปี 2564 จะจ้างพนักงานคาสิโนประมาณ 1,400 คนในดาวเทียมสี่ดวงและคาสิโน Limassol ชั่วคราว และในปีหน้า บริษัท จะจ้างงานเพิ่มอีกหลายพันรายเนื่องจาก City of Dreams Mediterranean ใกล้แล้วเสร็จ คาสิโนรีสอร์ทแบบบูรณาการจะมีคาสิโนประมาณ 81,000 ตารางฟุตซึ่งมีเครื่องสล็อต 1,000 เครื่องและเกมโต๊ะ 100 เกม สิ่งอำนวยความสะดวกนี้จะนำเสนอโรงแรมระดับห้าดาวที่มีห้องพัก 500 ห้องร้านอาหาร 11 แห่งร้านค้าปลีกสปาและศูนย์สุขภาพอัฒจันทร์กลางแจ้งและพื้นที่สำหรับการประชุมและกิจกรรมต่างๆ Melco ซึ่งตั้งอยู่ในฮ่องกงเป็นเจ้าของและดำเนินการ City of Dreams และ Studio City of Macau รวมถึง City of Dreams Manila ในฟิลิปปินส์ สิ่งที่ดึงดูดไซปรัสคืออัตราภาษีที่รัฐบาลเสนอให้ Melco จากรายได้จากการเล่นเกมขั้นต้น (GGR) City of Dreams Mediterranean เช่นเดียวกับคุณสมบัติการเล่นเกมที่มีขนาดเล็กกว่า 5 แห่งในปัจจุบันจ่ายภาษี 10% สำหรับเงินที่ชนะคาสิโน จากการเปรียบเทียบคาสิโนมาเก๊าแบ่ง 35% ของเงินรางวัลเกมสล็อตและเกมโต๊ะกับรัฐบาลท้องถิ่น ในฟิลิปปินส์คาสิโนบนบกจะถูกเก็บภาษี 25% สำหรับการเล่นเกมจำนวนมากและ 15% สำหรับเกมวีไอพี

แทงบอล
บาคทร่า
คาสิโน
คาสิโนออนไลน์
แทงหวย

Posted in Commercial Gaming, Coronavirus | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ประธานตลาดหลักทรัพย์นิวยอร์กปฏิเสธแนวคิดที่ว่าตลาดหุ้นคือคาสิโน


เผยแพร่เมื่อ: 15 กุมภาพันธ์ 2021, 08:48 น. Last updated: 15 ก.พ. 2564 08:48 น. หัวหน้าตลาดหลักทรัพย์นิวยอร์ก (NYSE) ปฏิเสธการเปรียบเทียบตลาดหุ้นล่าสุดกับการพนันคาสิโน Stacey Cunningham ประธานตลาดหลักทรัพย์นิวยอร์กปรากฏตัวที่ชั้นการซื้อขายในปี 2018 หลังจากกลายเป็นเพียงผู้หญิงคนที่สองเท่านั้นที่เข้ารับตำแหน่ง เขากล่าวว่าการเชื่อมต่อล่าสุดระหว่างคาสิโนและหุ้นไม่ถูกต้อง (ภาพ: รอยเตอร์) ความผันผวนในเดือนมกราคมของหุ้นเช่น GameStop และ AMC Entertainment ทำให้นักการเมืองบางคนวิพากษ์วิจารณ์ว่าตลาดดำเนินการอย่างไร พวกเขายืนยันว่าการซื้อขายหุ้นเป็นคาสิโนส่วนตัวของมหาเศรษฐีเจ้าของกองทุนป้องกันความเสี่ยง “นักลงทุนรายใหญ่และรายย่อยปฏิบัติต่อตลาดหุ้นเหมือนคาสิโน” วุฒิสมาชิกอลิซาเบ ธ วอร์เรน (D-Ma.) กล่าว ความคิดเห็นของเขาเกิดขึ้นหลังจากฟอรัม Reddit ชื่อ “wallstreetbets” จัดการกับราคาหุ้น GameStop และ AMC.Rep ได้สำเร็จ Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) มีความสุขกับสิ่งที่เห็นได้ชัดว่าเป็นปลาขนาดเล็กกลุ่มใหญ่ที่เผชิญหน้ากับฉลามที่ยิ่งใหญ่แห่ง Wall Street นักลงทุน Reddit ซื้อหุ้น GameStop และ AMC จำนวนมากเพื่อกำหนดเป้าหมายกองทุนป้องกันความเสี่ยงที่ตัดหุ้นอย่างมาก “ฉันต้องยอมรับว่ามันเป็นสิ่งที่จะได้เห็น Wall Streeters ที่มีประวัติอันยาวนานในการปฏิบัติต่อเศรษฐกิจของเราเช่นคาสิโนที่บ่นเกี่ยวกับฟอรัมโปสเตอร์ที่ปฏิบัติต่อตลาดเช่นคาสิโน” Ocasio-Cortez กล่าว ผู้นำตลาดปฏิเสธคำยืนยันในการให้สัมภาษณ์กับ “Axios ทาง HBO” ซึ่งออกอากาศในเย็นวันอาทิตย์ Stacey Cunningham ประธานตลาดหลักทรัพย์นิวยอร์กไม่สนใจความเชื่อมโยงระหว่างการซื้อขายหุ้นและการพนัน ไม่ใช่คาสิโน พวกเขาได้รับการควบคุมและดูแลอย่างสูง “คันนิงแฮมกล่าวเราดำเนินการตลาดที่เปิดโอกาสให้นักลงทุนเข้าไปลงทุนใน บริษัท ที่พวกเขาเชื่อมั่นเชื่อว่าพวกเขาจะเติบโตและมีส่วนแบ่งในการสร้างความมั่งคั่ง” เขากล่าวเสริม คันนิงแฮมเตือนผู้ร่างกฎหมายของรัฐนิวยอร์กว่าหากมีการเสนอภาษีธุรกรรมทางการเงินในออลบานี – เงินภาษีที่จัดสรรไว้เพื่อระดับที่ดีขึ้นของค่ายนักลงทุนจะพิจารณาย้าย NYSE ไปยังรัฐอื่น อย่างไรก็ตามเขาระบุว่าหน่วยงานกำกับดูแลตลาดตราสารทุนกำลัง “ดูใหม่” ในการขายชอร์ตโดยเฉพาะอย่างยิ่งในเรื่องของกองทุนป้องกันความเสี่ยงที่ครองตำแหน่งสำคัญในการเดิมพันกับความสำเร็จของ บริษัท ความแตกต่างมีมากกว่าความคล้ายคลึงกันมีความคล้ายคลึงกันหลายประการระหว่างคาสิโนและตลาดหุ้น เช่นเดียวกับ NYSE คาสิโนเชิงพาณิชย์ในลาสเวกัสได้รับการควบคุมอย่างเข้มงวด การพนันที่ถูกกฎหมายเป็นหนึ่งในอุตสาหกรรมที่มีการควบคุมและกลั่นกรองมากที่สุดในประเทศและผู้ที่เล่นการพนันรวมถึงผู้ที่ซื้อหุ้นก็ทำเช่นนั้นโดยหวังว่าจะได้เงินเพิ่มขึ้น แต่ละคนเกี่ยวข้องกับองค์ประกอบของความเสี่ยงและนักพนันและนักลงทุนที่มีความเชี่ยวชาญจะศึกษาความน่าจะเป็นของ บริษัท และการเงินเพื่อหาข้อได้เปรียบ แต่นั่นคือจุดสิ้นสุดของความคล้ายคลึงกันผู้เชี่ยวชาญคนหนึ่งกล่าว และผู้เชี่ยวชาญด้านโทรทัศน์ได้ดำเนินการมานานหลายปี และนั่นไม่เป็นความจริง “แฮงค์โคลแมนผู้ก่อตั้ง Money Q&A ซึ่งเป็นเว็บไซต์ที่ปรึกษาทางการเงินออนไลน์กล่าว Coleman ชี้ให้เห็นว่าการซื้อหุ้นคือการเป็นเจ้าของเขายังกล่าวด้วยว่าการพนันไม่เหมือนกับการลงทุนคือ” เกมที่ไม่มีผลรวม ” ซึ่งมีผู้ชนะและผู้แพ้เสมอในการลงทุนโคลแมนให้เหตุผลว่าผู้ชนะและผู้แพ้อาจมีระดับที่แตกต่างกันแม้ว่าจะอยู่ในชื่อเรื่องเดียวกันก็ตามโคลแมนยังอธิบายด้วยว่ามูลค่าไม่เคยถูกสร้างขึ้นในการพนัน แต่เป็นเพียงแค่เงิน ที่โอนระหว่างนักพนันหรือคาสิโนและผู้เล่น

แทงบอล
บาคทร่า
คาสิโน
คาสิโนออนไลน์
แทงหวย

Posted in Commercial Gaming, Financial | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

How Brain Training Software Helping with Online Poker Games?

Online poker games are popular nowadays. The option gives you a chance to play the game from anywhere, anytime, and win unlimited cash. With the invention of smartphones, tablets, and laptops, poker is no more confined within the boundaries of casinos.  

Although to play poker you need a well build up mind, however, some group of smart people has conjured up different programs that help in playing poker games online. The programs have been tested and seen that on the brighter side the programs allow to brush up the mathematical skills as well.  

Here are some of them that can help you win a poker tournament without much hassle. 

Brain age: Concentration 

This is an original brain training app and it is highly related to Lumosity in many ways. This program was smartly designed by Kawashima who is a neuroscientist. The major aim of this program is to train your brain to be younger by making it think like a younger individual. Using this program in a repetitive mode will surely increase your memory skills and also your concentration skills as well. For winning in real money poker, having a high concentration is the key. In case you’re unable to develop the same, then this program will be a helpful option for the same.  

PokerTracker 4 

For serious poker professionals, PokerTracker 4 is the best option. Many professionals have successfully won thousands and millions after using this program. What makes this program different from the others? It’s the amount of information about the opponents that you will guaranteed get from this program. Unlike casinos, in online poker tables, knowing the least amount of information about the opponent will help you win the match easily. Obviously bluffing is absolutely not an option in online poker. Hence, understanding the psychology of the opponent player gets difficult as the game proceeds.  

Lumosity 

This is a brain-training app and you’ll find millions of users of this software. Since the UI is very simple, hence even the novice players can relate to this software. Free version of the program is available for android, iOS and PC users. By installing this program, you can easily focus on developing the memory, critical thinking ability and adapts easily to any type of poker games online. Indeed, a good way to increase your intelligence as well!  

Cognifit 

This is popular program developed by a healthcare company. Although the features are similar to that of Lumosity, however here’s another incredible feature that is loved by all poker online players. Not only for poker, but also you can use this program to successfully revive the brains of adults in care centers. Undoubtedly a great invention and why is it so because the same helps in development of the brain cells. Use it and become more intelligent than others.  

Although you easily use these programs to become a brainer, however, there’s no alternative to natural meditation alternatives. Keep practicing your poker tournament games, keep meditating and improve your brainpower and become a true winner in online poker India.  

Happy Playing !!

Read More:

Interesting Facts About A Poker Dealer

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

Posted in best online poker, Best Online Poker Sites, best poker online, Best Poker Sites, best poker sites in india, How To Play Poker, online poker, Online Poker Games, Online Poker India, Online Poker Real Money, Online Poker Sites, Online Poker Tournaments, Play Poker Online, Poker Games Online, Poker Online, poker online India, poker real money, poker sites in india, poker tournament, Poker Tournaments, Real Money Poker, real poker India | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sheldon Adelson: How the Legend Affected Poker and Intertops Login


Sheldon Adelson, an American businessman – and billionaire – died on January 11, 2021. At the age of 87, he lost his battle with cancer, after almost two years of treatments. And while Adelson owned many businesses, he will be mostly remembered for his involvement in the gambling industry.Over the years, the casino mogul took live gambling to an entirely new level. However, it was clear he wasn’t a big fan of online poker. How did this tycoon influence the industry? And what could he possibly have said to influence Intertops login options and online betting in general? Let’s take a closer look at the man’s history and involvement with poker.Adelson’s Career and Early LifeSheldon Gary Adelson was born in 1933 in Boston, and from a young age, it was clear he had an eye for business. At the age of 12, he began selling newspapers, which turned into a passion of his further down the line.After serving in the US Army, Adelson started various businesses, some more successful than others. He tried his luck in travel, hotel toiletries, and mortgage banking. But his first major success came when he helped build the Interface Group with several partners, launching the highly successful COMDEX. Soon enough, the technology trade show became one of the largest in the field, and Adelson helped run it smoothly till it was sold in 1995.His next project included venturing into the gambling industry, and in 1999, he opened the Venetian Resort Hotel Casino. Slowly but surely, it turned into a highly popular gambling resort. Later on, Adelson had the chance to expand his businesses in Macau, which is a beloved gambling destination for travelers. One casino turned into two, then three, and before he knew it – Adelson was in charge of a billion-dollar empire.In September 2020, Adelson was listed by Forbes as the 28th richest person in the world, with a net worth of $33.8 billion. A big chunk of that came from his share in the gambling empire, which was worth approximately $14 billion at the time of his death.Adelson’s Influence on Online PokerWhile Adelson opened many land-based casinos both in the US and abroad, he wasn’t a big supporter of online gambling. In fact, when the DOJ announced the Wire Act didn’t apply to online betting (under Obama’s administrations), the casino mogul did his best to fight that decision.He founded the Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling, trying to promote the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) with little success. Later on, he supported multiple Republican presidential candidates, which were more likely to adopt his views on online betting.After spending a lot of money on the issue, he got some support from Trump’s administration, as the DOJ went back to its original stance on the Wire Act a few years ago.But while his campaigns against online gambling left a lot of players disheartened by his actions, there is no ignoring all the good things he did. According to the Las Vegas Review-Journal, Adelson donated millions of dollars to multiple causes. He supported wounded soldiers and contributed a lot to the fight against drug addiction – matters that were close to his heart.In ConclusionEven though Adelson campaigned against online gambling, he still deserves respect for all he was able to achieve in his life.

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

No Man’s Land: Will Genderless Cards Reinvent Poker Download Games?


Poker cards have looked the same for quite some time, and most people didn’t question their design or meaning. For many decades, the higher-valued cards were represented by members of the royal family – kings, queens, and princes.However, some people believe that the popular card design is outdated and that it’s time to change things up. In recent weeks, poker players have been talking about an alternative kind of design for a deck of cards: genderless figures.What stands behind the proposition of changing the current deck? Will it influence poker download games? And what does history say about changing trends in card design? Learn all of that NOW!Woman Proposes to Use a Genderless Deck – and the Masses ReactIndy Mellink, a young woman from the Netherlands, came up with the idea of designing a gender-neutral deck of cards. The forensic psychology graduate even went as far as manufacturing and distributing more than 1,500 packs of cards to spread her message.But what gave Mellink the idea that something needed to be changed? Apparently, while playing card games with her family, the young innovator figured out something she has never paid attention to before. Why was the king automatically worth more than the queen?In an interview, Mellink said: “… it’s just another way of saying hey, you’re less important”. While cards’ value might be a small thing, it is still a part of our society that tells women they aren’t as important as men. Maybe, by changing seemingly trivial parts of our culture, we will be able to reduce gender inequality on a bigger scale as well.Instead, the new deck of cards includes gold, silver, and bronze imagery to replace the royal characters that we know so well. But what did people, including some online poker players, thought about this initiative?The Public’s ResponseWhen news of the gender-neutral cards deck made headlines, some people were supportive – and some were not.The head of the Dutch Bridge Association, for example, said: “… But gender neutrality, I am all for it! It’s great that someone of this age has noticed this”. However, she also said that the new type of cards won’t be used anytime soon in official games, as it will require a rewrite of the existing rules.Mellink also claimed that many of the people she approached have never even considered the gender issue when playing cards. Therefore, they haven’t had a lot to say about the subject.But most tweets and online reactions actually mocked the idea. Reuters reported that one man said: “…it’s ridiculous”, while another made a valid point: “… Isn’t the ace the highest card already? And that is gender-neutral. Check and mate.”Card Designs in the PastWhile we’re all used to the cards that started this entire debate, in the past, this style of cards was used mainly in France, and then reaching Belgium and England. The French were the first to officially use the classic suits – ♥, ♦, ♣, ♠.Other countries, however, had a different vision as to what playing cards should look like. In the past, Spanish card suits included cups, coins, clubs, and swords. The same thing goes for Italian decks, although the designs looked a bit different.Germany also had unique card suits – including hearts, bells, acorns, and leaves. And even now, you will be able to find some of those traditional cards in various countries all across the world.In ConclusionOverall, it seems that people weren’t overly enthusiastic about the idea, but who knows? Maybe in the future, we will see new card designs gracing the poker tables.For now, it seems more likely that people will be able to find gender-neutral cards only in gift shops and the likes of it.

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Daniel Negreanu Reacts to Hellmuth’s Criticism, Challenges Poker Brat to HU Duel


The recently concluded grudge match between Daniel Negreanu and Doug Polk created a lot of stir in the poker community and gave everyone hours’ worth of great, high stakes entertainment.
Polk came into the match as the favorite and walked away the winner after 25,000 hands, banking $1.2 million for his victory.
In the days following the conclusion of the HU challenge, many players shared their views of the match, among others Phil Hellmuth.
Hellmuth was supporting Negreanu from the get-go, but he wasn’t too happy about the final result and in a recent interview, the Poker Brat openly stated he was disappointed by the Canadian’s performance.

The short, two-minute segment, didn’t go unnoticed by Negreanu, who responded by challenging Hellmuth to a heads up match under his terms.
DNegs Quick to Respond to Phil’s Jab
Helllmuth’s short statement about Negreanu’s play also included not so thinly veiled brag about his own poker skills.
The way Phil explains it, Negreanu’s coaching team was recommended by him as he recognized them as very good and capable players.

However, Phil sent them Daniel’s way because they didn’t have much to teach him?

It seems Hellmuth is trying to suggest that he already knows everything Negreanu has spent months trying to learn and Polk spent years studying.
Daniel wasted no time responding to Phil, challenging him to a heads up match under any terms he wanted: live or online and for whatever number of hands he wanted to play.

It goes without saying that the poker community was thrilled to see the Canadian’s reaction, but will Hellmuth go for it?
Will There Be a Hellmuth vs. Negreanu HU Match?
Phil Hellmuth is known as an outspoken player who holds his own skills in very high regard. The whole Poker Brat attitude has been a part of his persona for years and helped him build a brand around his name.
But, facing an open challenge by Negreanu, what are the odds of Phil actually accepting?

Personally, I don’t think they are very high at all.

While Hellmuth loves to talk the talk, he’s not very likely to walk the walk in the situation where he must know he’s a big underdog. Even if the two had equal skills before the Negreanu – Polk challenge, Daniel has put in countless hours studying HU play and GTO.
DNegs was going into the grudge match against the odds and for that alone, he earned some respect from the community and from Polk himself.
At this moment in time, the skill gap in the particular format between Negreanu and Hellmuth could be even wider than it was between DNegs and Polk when the grudge match was announced.

Even Polk said after the match that he wouldn’t be as thrilled to play Negreanu again as he felt Daniel has improved a lot over the months of the challenge.
The Canadian would probably jump at the opportunity to play some one-on-one poker with the Poker Brat and put his newly found skills (that he paid dearly to acquire) to good use. Plus, the skirmish would likely be just as popular (if not more) as the original grudge match.
One Is Allowed to Dream
In the same video included earlier, Hellmuth boasted his heads-up skills, claiming he’d won 29 of his last 30 HU matches.
This is technically right, but these were all short battles, featuring no more than a few hundred poker hands.

In a prolonged match that would last 10,000+ hands, DNegs would have to be a clear favorite, just like Polk was against the Canadian.

And, to be completely honest, it seems really farfetched that the Poker Brat would accept to play Negreanu in this format. If anything, he might be up for a few hundred poker hands, which is far too small of a sample size to determine who the better player is.
One is allowed to hope, though.
If Hellmuth and Negreanu were somehow to come to an agreement for an actual, proper heads up match that would include the kind of coverage that we saw in the earlier challenge, it would be a real treat for the fans.
Both DNegs and Phil are in the group of the most popular poker players alive and their “grudge” match would attract hundreds of thousands of eyeballs.
Is it likely to happen? No, absolutely not – but we sure as hell root for it! And, if the match were to happen, who would you bet on and what odds do you think would be fair?

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

Posted in Poker World | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Partypoker US Network and LearnWPT Launches Free Poker Strategy Learning Tool “For the Player”

Partypoker US Network and LearnWPT, World Poker Tour’s educational poker coaching partner, have collaborated to launch a new learning tool called “For the Player.”

This new educational program will provide free poker strategy and analysis to help players develop their skills and improve their gameplay.

As per the press release, “For the Player” material is available to all players in the United States and is aimed at players of all skill levels.

Players who subscribe will receive a series of weekly exclusive newsletters featuring content materials such as ‘GTO Trainer Packs,’ ‘Strategy Episodes,’ ‘Poker Decision Hands,’ ‘Interactive Train & Explain Series’ and more.

Furthermore, players will also be provided with training blogs and live sessions with Team LearnWPT comprising Andrew “LuckyChewy” Lichtenberger, Tony Dunst, Vanessa Selbst, Jared Tendler, and Nick Binger.

This free educational poker program is currently focused on its ring-fenced network in New Jersey, which comprises three poker skins that all share liquidity: partypoker NJ itself, BetMGM Poker and Borgata Poker.

BetMGM: 100% legal, regulated online poker, sports and casino games in New Jersey!

However, players in Michigan and Pennsylvania may also be able to take advantage of these free courses once BetMGM, in association with Roar Digital—a joint venture between MGM Resorts International and Entain (the parent company of partypoker)—goes live in these two states.

As per our exclusive report, Roar Digital will be launching online poker in Michigan this month under the BetMGM brand. It will become the second online poker operator to go live in the Wolverine State. PokerStars MI was the first to go live at the end of last month.

Players who sign up today to the casino can verify their accounts and deposit to be ready when the new poker room opens from Day 1.

The company is also expected to launch online poker in Pennsylvania soon.

All these educational poker learning materials are being made available for free thanks to its partnership with LearnWPT.

LearnWPT is WPT’s educational partner platform launched in 2016 and founded by Nick Binger. It is a membership-based coaching tool, designed to help players fix their leaks by helping them learn Game Theory Optimal (GTO) strategy.

“LearnWPT is thrilled to work with partypoker US Network to bring the latest in educational poker content to its network of players,” said Nick Binger, LearnWPT Founder and President.

“Alongside the most trusted, recognizable name in online poker, we will use ‘For The Player’ to continue to encourage all players to have fun while developing their skills and style of play – a goal since our 2016 launch,” Binger added.

BetMGM is live in Michigan for Sports and Casino — and poker is coming soon!Best bonusUp to $1000 deposit match bonus in the casino.Top-rated slots and casino games.Operator slated to launch online poker in early 2021!Sign up today to so you’re verified and ready to hit the tables.Get Your Welcome BonusGet $25 in FREEPLAY plus $1000 deposit match bonus! »No bonus code required

Upcoming PKO Online Tournament Series on partypoker US Network

Partypoker US Network players will be able to test their skills in the upcoming online tournament series slated to run this month.

A total of eight bounty events are scheduled starting February 21, with one event running every day until February 28. In total, over $250,000 is guaranteed including a $100,000 Main Event on the final day of the series.

Buy-ins are all in three figures ranging from $109 to $525. Each of them is played either 6-handed or 8-handed. The series is open exclusively for New Jersey players.

The opening event is a special one as players will be able to take advantage of the LearnWPT coaching tool as for the first time players will be provided with real-time in-depth analysis of key hands across social media channels.

“’For The Player’ is partypoker US Network’s latest initiative supporting our players and the larger online poker community,” said Ray Stefanelli, Director of Poker, partypoker US Network.

“Last month, with the World Poker Tour, we offered players an incredible $1 million guaranteed WPT® Online Poker Open Main Event. Now, through this partnership with LearnWPT, we’ll help players strengthen their play and foster their passion for the game,” Stefanelli added.

Some of the highlights of the upcoming partypoker US Network February online series:

Event #1, Sunday, Feb 21: The opening event with a $40,000 prize pool and a $215 buy-in played in 6-max format. This event will provide free in-depth analysis and review in realtime of key hands from Team LearnWPT across the site’s social channels;
Event #4, Wednesday, Feb 24: The 40-Stack tourney with a $15,000 guarantee costing $109 to enter. The tournament is structured uniquely, with players starting with 40,000 chips and the blinds remaining fixed at 500/1000/125 for the first 40 mins after which the blinds go up every 8 mins;
Event #7, Saturday, Feb 27: A $30,000 guarantee event, also 6-Max with variable buy-ins and a buy-in of $320;
Event #8, Sunday, Feb 28: The $100,000 guaranteed event to cap off the series. It is played 8-handed and costs $535 to enter. Players start with 100,000 chips and for every bounty, players win a minimum of $125.

Partypoker US Network’s bounty PKO series runs from February 21 through to February 28.

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment