Tag Archives: คาสิโน มาเก๊า ออนไลน์

GGPoker Adds More Variety to No-Strings-Attached “Daily Freebie” Promotion

Verified players can continue to play a real-money game, such as Flip & Go and Spin & Gold, for free each and every day.One of the most popular promotions for low stakes players on GGPoker has been further expanded.

During the software update on February 10, the Daily Free Spin promotion changed to Daily Freebie. Furthermore, UK players can now also claim the daily gift for a chance to boost their bankrolls.

All players, both existing and new, just need to have verified accounts and log in each day to claim their gift, which lets plays play real money tournaments—and compete for real money cash prizes.

The update has expanded what is given away. Now, there are Daily Freebie tickets for Flip & Go, the super-successful new format introduced in January 2021. It has also undergone some changes since its launch, with GGPoker increasing the frequency and adjusting the buy-ins as well as the maximum number of stacks for purchase.

“GGPoker is happy to confirm that we’ve relaunched our Daily Free Spin offer as the Daily Freebie; verified players can continue to play a real-money game, such as Flip & Go and Spin & Gold, for free each and every day. All they need to do is log in and claim their daily reward!” said Paul Burke, Head of Public Relations at GGPoker.

“We hope to continue to change up the rewards on offer in the future, giving all players the opportunity to try out GGPoker’s most exciting games, no matter their bankroll.”

For existing players, Daily Freebie is available immediately—just log in and claim.

If you haven’t yet signed up, you can do so today and enjoy the promotion as soon as you have verified your account. You can also take advantage of all of GGPoker’s generous welcome bonuses.

How the GGPoker Daily Freebie Promotion Works

The operator has seen unprecedented growth in 2020 to become one of the leading online poker platforms for tournaments and cash games. GGPoker has achieved that with a plethora of promotions, innovations, and high-profile partnerships. Their continued success has led to a record $7.5 million in promotions given away in February 2021.

One of several promotions for players with smaller bankrolls is the Daily Freebie formerly the Daily Free Spin.

This was launched on September 7, 2020. It has given verified players the opportunity to claim one $0.25 Spin & Gold ticket every day ever since. The free ticket courtesy of GGPoker continues to be available under the new name three times per week—*but this rotates with other ticket types.*

Players can see the next six upcoming Daily Freebies listed under the “My Promo” tab. A new daily gift becomes available after each daily reset at midnight Pacific time. Each ticket will continue to feature an expiration date of 24 hours once the Daily Freebie has been awarded.

The current rotation of Daily Freebie is fixed for the time being. However, GGPoker hopes “to change the daily prizes on a semi-regular basis,” according to Burke. He also hinted at a strong possibility that the Daily Freebie will include the alternative currencies C$ or T$ sometime soon.

Newly included as a prize in the Daily Freebie is a $1 Spin & Gold ticket, which can be claimed once per week. Furthermore, five $0.05 Flip & Go tickets are up for grabs three times per week, giving players the chance at trying the new tournament format free of charge.

As a mixture between a Flipout and regular tournament, Flip & Go was launched on January 12, 2021. However, it only took a few days for the first tweaks to be made. Initially slated to take place once every hour, it was soon increased to once every 30 minutes.

The buy-ins were also adjusted and the lowest available stake was increased to $0.05 with a guarantee of $50. Players can now take a shot at their own leisure three times per week and enter this lowest tier with five stacks thanks to the Daily Freebie.

Upon launch, the Flip & Go featured a maximum of 10 entries for each of the four stakes. However, that number has been adjusted recently and the stacks for purchase are now capped at a maximum of eight. This makes the bonus stacks based on the holdings during the Flipout stage more valuable in comparison.

The overall feedback for the new tournament format has been very positive, as outlined by Burke.

“Players love it! We have been very pleasantly surprised by the positivity seen across almost all feedback, of course not all players are interested in a new game type but those who have tried it have mostly good things to say about Flip & Go. We’ve also received some constructive criticism, which is also valuable.”

Further tweaks to the Flip & Go format may very well possible, as GGPoker is constantly reviewing and optimizing its schedule. One such adjustment was made with the expansion of the popular Daily GGMasters earlier in February.

The changes to the Daily Freebie promotion went live on February 10. All verified GGPoker players in eligible countries can claim their daily gift under the “My Promo” tab after each daily reset.

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

บาร์ตันซีอีโอของ Crown Resorts ลาออกหลังจากมีข่าวการฟอกเงิน


เผยแพร่เมื่อ: กุมภาพันธ์ 15 2021, 01:14. อัพเดทล่าสุด: 15 กุมภาพันธ์ 2564,01: 14 น. Ken Barton CEO ของ Crown Resorts ก้าวลงจากตำแหน่งในวันจันทร์เนื่องจากอาการกำเริบอย่างต่อเนื่องเนื่องจากมีรายงานที่ท่วมท้นซึ่งทำให้ บริษัท ต่อสู้เพื่อใบอนุญาตของรัฐนิวเซาท์เวลส์ Ken Barton ควรได้รับการตรวจสอบครั้งใหญ่แม้จะมีการวิพากษ์วิจารณ์อย่างรุนแรงเกี่ยวกับผลงานของเขาในฐานะ Crown CEO (ภาพ: ชาวออสเตรเลียตะวันตก) การลาออกของบาร์ตันอยู่บนไพ่นับตั้งแต่การเปิดตัวรายงานโดยแพทริเซียเบอร์กินผู้พิพากษาศาลฎีกาของรัฐนิวเซาท์เวลส์ซึ่งอธิบายว่าเขา “ไม่ตรงกับสิ่งที่จำเป็นสำหรับผู้ถือใบอนุญาตของคาสิโน” . “ ปัญหาของเขาจะไม่ได้รับการแก้ไขโดยการแต่งตั้งผู้เชี่ยวชาญในอุตสาหกรรมที่รายงานต่อเขา” เบอร์กินกล่าวเสริม รายงานสรุปว่า Crown กำลัง “อำนวยความสะดวกในการฟอกเงินเปิดเผยเจ้าหน้าที่ให้เสี่ยงต่อการถูกคุมขังในเขตอำนาจศาลต่างประเทศและดำเนินความสัมพันธ์ทางธุรกิจกับบุคคลที่เชื่อมโยงกับ Triads และกลุ่มอาชญากรรมที่จัดตั้งขึ้น” ขอแนะนำให้หน่วยงานกำกับดูแลการเล่นเกมของรัฐ ILGA ปฏิเสธการต่ออายุใบอนุญาตการเล่นเกมของ Crown ใน NSW บริษัท เปิดรีสอร์ทในซิดนีย์มูลค่า 1.7 พันล้านดอลลาร์ในเดือนธันวาคมโดยไม่มีกิจการคาสิโน วันจ่ายเงิน 3 ล้านดอลลาร์แม้จะมีการระบุไว้ในรายงานของ Bergin แต่บาร์ตันคาดว่าจะเกษียณอายุด้วยการจ่ายเงินอย่างน้อย 3 ล้านดอลลาร์ออสเตรเลีย (2.3 ล้านดอลลาร์) ตามรายงานของเดอะการ์เดียน บาร์ตันได้แสดงให้เห็นถึง “การขาดความสนใจอย่างมาก” โดยตอบข้อกล่าวหาของสื่อที่ว่า Crown อำนวยความสะดวกในการฟอกเงินที่อสังหาริมทรัพย์ในเมลเบิร์นและเพิร์ ธ ในหน้าที่ก่อนหน้านี้ของเขาในฐานะ CFO เขาเคยรับผิดชอบบัญชีวีไอพีสองบัญชีที่แก๊งอาชญากรใช้เพื่อฟอกเงินจากการดำเนินการที่ผิดกฎหมายของพวกเขา Bergin กล่าว บาร์ตันได้รับเลือกให้ดำรงตำแหน่งซีอีโอในเดือนมกราคม 2563 หลังจากอยู่กับ บริษัท มานานกว่าทศวรรษ Helen Coonan ประธานกรรมการคนปัจจุบันจะเข้ามาแทนที่เขาจนกว่าจะพบซีอีโอคนใหม่ “ สมมติว่าบทบาทของประธานบริหารเป็นการตัดสินใจที่ฉันไม่ได้ดำเนินการอย่างจริงจังคณะกรรมการเชื่อว่าจะให้ความมั่นคงและความแน่นอนในการเป็นผู้นำในช่วงเวลาสำคัญทางธุรกิจนี้” Coonan กล่าวในแถลงการณ์ต่อ ASX Coonan กล่าวเมื่อวันจันทร์ว่า บริษัท กำลังดำเนินการ “ขั้นตอนสำคัญในการปรับปรุงการกำกับดูแลการปฏิบัติตามข้อกำหนดและวัฒนธรรมของเรา” Exec ExodusBarton เดินตามผู้บริหารของ Crown อีกห้าคนออกไปที่ประตู ซึ่งรวมถึง Michael Johnston และ Guy Jalland ซึ่งเป็นตัวแทนของมหาเศรษฐี James Packer ผู้ถือหุ้นรายใหญ่ที่สุดของ Crown ในคณะกรรมการ Bergin วิพากษ์วิจารณ์ Packer ว่าทำหน้าที่เป็น “กรรมการโดยพฤตินัย” แม้ว่าจะไม่ได้อยู่ในคณะกรรมการมาหลายปีแล้วก็ตามและแนะนำว่าเขามี “อิทธิพลที่ผิดปกติ” ต่อสังคม นอกจากนี้เขายังแนะนำให้ จำกัด การถือครอง 10 เปอร์เซ็นต์ในทรัพย์สินของ Crown นั่นหมายความว่า Packer จะถูกบังคับให้ต้องขายหุ้นบางส่วนใน บริษัท – ถ้าไม่ใช่ทั้งหมด Packer กล่าวในระหว่างการเป็นพยานต่อการสอบสวนของ Bergin ว่าเขาพร้อมที่จะละทิ้งการถือหุ้นใน Crown หากเขาปกป้องใบอนุญาตขององค์กร

แทงบอล
บาคทร่า
คาสิโน
คาสิโนออนไลน์
แทงหวย

Posted in Asia-Pacific Gaming, Regulation, Scandals | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Criticisms of Michael Slepian’s Stanford study on poker tells and hand movements (published 2015)


Some places the study was featured.
The following is reposted from a 2015 piece I wrote for Bluff magazine. It was originally located at this URL but has become unavailable due to Bluff going out of business. I saw this study mentioned recently in Maria Konnikova’s book ‘The Biggest Bluff’ and was reminded about this piece and noticed it was offline, so I wanted to share it again. A few notes on this piece:

The original title below and was more negative-sounding than I liked; Bluff chose it. Also, if I could rewrite this piece now, I’d probably choose less negative-sounding phrasing in some places. 
Regardless of the exact factors that might be at work in the found correlation, I realize it’s scientifically interesting that a significant correlation was found. But I also think it’s possible to draw simplistic and wrong conclusions from the study, and my piece hopefully gives more context about the factors that might be at work.
Image on left taken from Michael Slepian’s media page.

The Slepian Study on Betting Motions Doesn’t Pass Muster
A 2013 study¹ conducted at Stanford University by graduate student Michael Slepian and associates found a correlation between the “smoothness” of a betting motion and the strength of the bettor’s hand. In a nutshell, there was a positive correlation found between betting motions perceived as “smooth” and “confident” and strong hands. The quality of the betting motions was judged by having experiment participants watch short clips of players making bets (taken from the 2009 WSOP Main Event) and estimate the hand strength of those bets.
This experiment has gotten a lot of press over the last couple years. I first heard about it on NPR. Since, I’ve seen it referenced in poker blogs and articles and in a few mainstream news articles. I still occasionally hear people talk about it at the table when I play. I’ve had friends and family members reference it and send me links to it. It’s kind of weird how much attention it received, considering the tons of interesting studies that are constantly being done, but I guess it can be chalked up to the mystique and “sexiness” of poker tells.

The article had more than casual interest for me. I’m a former professional poker player and the author of two books on poker behavior: Reading Poker Tells and Verbal Poker Tells. I’ve been asked quite a few times about my opinion on this study, and I’ve been meaning to look at the study more closely and write up my thoughts for a while.
In this article, I’ll give some criticisms of the study and some suggestions for how this study (and similar studies) could be done better. This isn’t to denigrate the work of the experiment’s designers. I think this is an interesting study, and I hope it will encourage similar studies using poker as a means to study human behavior. But I do think it was flawed in a few ways, and it could be improved in many ways.
That’s not to say that I think their conclusion is wrong; in fact, in my own experience, I think their conclusion is correct. I do, however, think it’s a very weak general correlation and will only be practically useful if you have a player-specific behavioral baseline. My main point is that this study is not enough, on its own, to cause us to be confident about the conclusion.
I’ll give a few reasons for why I think the study is flawed, but the primary underlying reason is a common one for studies involving poker: the study’s organizers just don’t know enough about how poker works. I’ve read about several experiments involving poker where the organizers were very ignorant about some basic aspects of poker, and this affected the way the tests were set up and the conclusions that were reached (and this probably applies not just to poker-related studies but to many studies that involve an activity that requires a lot of experience to understand well).
Poker can seem deceptively simple to people first learning it, and even to people who have played it for decades. Many bad players lose money at poker while believing that they’re good, or even great players. In the same way, experiment designers may falsely believe they understand the factors involved in a poker hand, while being far off the mark.
Here are the flaws, as I see them, in this study:
1. The experimenters refer to all WSOP entrants as ‘professional poker players.’
This first mistake wouldn’t directly affect the experiment, but it does point to a basic misunderstanding of poker and the World Series of Poker, which might indirectly affect other aspects of the experiment and its conclusions.
Here are a couple examples of this from the study:
The World Series of Poker (WSOP), originating in 1970, brings together professional poker players every year (from the study’s supplemental materials)
These findings are notable because the players in the stimulus clips were highly expert professionals competing in the high-stakes WSOP tournament.
The WSOP Main Event is open to anyone and most entrants are far from being professional poker players. Categorizing someone’s poker skill can be difficult and subjective, but Kevin Mathers, a long-time poker industry worker, estimates that only 20% of WSOP Main Event entrants are professional (or professional-level) players.
This also weakens the conclusion that the results are impressive due to the players analyzed being professional-level. While the correlation found in this experiment is still interesting, it is somewhat expected that amateur players would have behavioral inconsistencies. I’d be confident in predicting that a similar study done on only video clips of bets made by professional poker players would not find such a clear correlation.
2. Hand strength is based on comparing players’ hands
This is a line from the study that explains their methodology for categorizing a player’s hand as ‘weak’ or ‘strong’:
Each player’s objective likelihood of winning during the bet was known (WSOP displays these statistics on-screen; however, we kept this information from participants by obscuring part of the screen).
They relied on the on-screen percentage graphics, which are displayed beside a player’s hand graphics in the broadcast. These graphics show the likelihood of a player’s hand winning; it does this by comparing it to the other players’ known hands. This makes it an illogical way to categorize whether a player believes he is betting a weak or strong hand.
If this isn’t clear, here’s a quick example to make my point:
A player has QQ and makes an all-in bet on a turn board of Q-10-10-8. Most people would say that this player has a strong hand and has every reason to believe he has a strong hand. But, if his opponent had 10-10, the player with Q-Q would have a 2.27% chance of winning with one card to come. According to this methodology, the player with the Q-Q would be judged as having a weak hand; if the test participants categorized that bet as representing a strong hand, they would be wrong.
It’s not stated in the study or the supplemental materials if the experimenters accounted for such obvious cases of how using the percentage graphics might skew the results. It’s also not stated how the experimenters would handle river (last-round) bets, when one hand has a 100 percent winning percentage and the losing hand has 0 percent (the only exception would be a tie).
It’s admittedly difficult to come up with hard-and-fast rules for categorizing hand strength for the purposes of such an experiment. As someone who has thought more than most about this problem, for the purpose of analyzing and categorizing poker tells, I know it’s a difficult task. But using the known percentages of one hand beating another known hand is clearly a flawed approach.
The optimal approach would probably be to come up with a system that pits a poker hand against a logical hand range, considering the situation, or even a random hand range, and uses that percentage-of-winning to rank the player’s hand strength. If this resulted in too much hand-strength ambiguity, the experiment designers could throw out all hands where the hand strength fell within a certain medium-strength range. Such an approach would make it more likely that only strong hand bets and weak hand bets were being used and, equally important for an experiment like this, that the player believed he or she was betting either a strong or weak hand.
3. Situational factors were not used to categorize betting motions
When considering poker-related behavior, situations are very important. A small continuation-bet on the flop is different in many ways from an all-in bet on the river. One way they are different: a small bet is unlikely to cause stress in the bettor, even if the bettor has a weak hand.
Also, a player making a bet on an early round has a chance for improving his hand; whereas a player betting on the river has no chance to improve his hand. When a player bets on the river, he will almost always know whether he is bluffing or value-betting; this is often not the case on earlier rounds, when hand strength is more ambiguous and undefined.
This experiment had no system for selecting the bets they chose for inclusion in the study. The usability of the clips was apparently based only on whether the clip meant certain visual needs of the experiment: i.e., did the footage show the entirety of the betting action and did it show the required amount of the bettor’s body?
From the study:
Research assistants, blind to experimental hypotheses, extracted each usable video in each installment, and in total extracted 22 videos (a standard number of stimuli for such studies; Ambady & Rosenthal, 1993) for Study 2 in the main text.
Study 1 videos required a single player be in the frame from the chest-up, allowing for whole-body, face-only, and arms-only videos to be created by cropping the videos. These videos were therefore more rare, and the research assistants only acquired 20 such videos.
The fact that clips were chosen only based on what they showed is not necessarily a problem. If a hand can be accurately categorized as strong or weak, then it doesn’t necessarily matter when during a hand it occurred. If there is a correlation between perceived betting motion quality and hand strength, then it will probably make itself known no matter the context of the bet.
Choosing bets only from specific situations would have made the experiment stronger and probably would have led to more definite conclusions. It could also help address the problem of categorizing hand strength. For example, if the experiment designers had only considered bets above a certain size that had occurred on the river (when all cards are out and there are no draws or semi-bluffs to be made), then that would result in polarized hand strengths (i.e., these bets would be very likely to be made with either strong or weak hands).
Also, the experiment’s method for picking clips sounds like it could theoretically result in all strong-hand bets being picked, or all weak-hand bets being picked. There is nothing in the experiment description that requires a certain amount of weak hands or strong hands. This is not in itself bad, but could affect the experiment in unforeseen ways.
For example, if most of the betting motion clips chosen were taken from players betting strong hands (which would not be surprising, as most significant bets, especially post-flop, are for value), then this could introduce some unforeseen bias into the experiment. One way this might happen: when a video clip shows only the betting motion (and not, for example, the bettor’s entire torso or just the face, as were shown to some study groups), this focus might emphasize the bet in the viewer’s mind and make the bet seem stronger. And if most of the hands-only betting clips were of strong-hand bets (and I have no idea how many were), the study participants watching only the hand-motion betting clips would falsely appear to be making good guesses.
My main point here is that thinking about the situational factors of a betting motion, and incorporating that into the experiment in some way, would have resulted in less ambiguity about the results. (It appears that it was difficult to find usable clips from a single WSOP event; in that case, the experimenters could just add footage from another WSOP Main Event to the study.)
4. The number of chips bet was not taken into account
The experiment designers did not take into account the chips that were bet. In their words:
During betting, each player pushes poker chips into the center of the table. Each chip has a specific color, which indicates a specific value. These values range from $25 to $100,000. This range of chip values has a crucial consequence for the current work. The number of chips does not correlate with the quality of the hand (see Table 1A in the main text). Players could move a stack of 20 chips into the center of the table, and this could be worth $500 or $2,000,000 (the winner of the 2009 WSOP won $8,547,042, thus the latter bet magnitude is a bet that can be made in the WSOP). Because no participants were professional poker players, nor considered themselves poker experts, they were not aware of chip values. They could not, then, use the number of chips as a valid cue to judge poker hand quality.
It’s true that your average person would not know what the chip colors at the WSOP Main Event mean. But it seems naïve to think that seeing the chips being bet couldn’t possibly have an effect on the experiment.
For one thing, the number of chips being bet could bias a participant to think a bet was stronger or weaker, whether correctly or incorrectly. What if all the strong-hand bets in the study were also bets that involved a lot of chips? (This is not implausible because smaller bets with weak hands are common early in a hand, when bets are small, whereas larger bets later in the hand are more likely to represent strong hands.) And what if some of the study participants were able to deduce (consciously or unconsciously) the strength of the bet from the number of chips?
Also, it’s possible that some of the test participants were knowledgeable (consciously or not) about some WSOP chip colors and what their denominations were. Or they were able to deduce (consciously or not), from the arrangement and number of chips, what the chip values were. (For example, large denomination chips are generally required to be kept at the front of a player’s stack.)
Again, this could have been addressed by selecting bets taken only from specific situations and only of certain bet sizes. If all bets chosen were above a certain bet size, and this was communicated to the study participants, then this would have lessened the impact of the chips being able to be seen.
5. Quality of “smoothness” was subjective
The experiment was based on the perceptions of study participants watching the assembled video clips. It was not based on objective measurements of what constitutes “smoothness” of a betting motion. This was a known issue in the experiment:
Thus, both player confidence and smoothness judgments significantly predicted likelihoods of winning, which suggests that movement smoothness might be a valid cue for assessing poker hand quality. It is unknown, however, how participants interpreted “smoothness” or whether the players’ movements that participants rated as smooth were truly smoother than other players’ movements. Other physical factors, such as speed, likely played a role.
This is not a major criticism; I think using perception is a fine way to find a correlation, especially for a preliminary study. But I think it does mean that we have no reason to be confident in the idea that smoothness of betting motion is correlated with hand strength. If there is are correlations between betting motion and hand strength (which I believe there are), these could be due to other aspects of arm motion or hand motion, such as: the betting speed, the position of the hands, the height of the hand, or other, more obscure, factors.
In summary
Again, I don’t mean to denigrate the experiment designers and the work they’ve done. I think this was an interesting experiment, and I think it’s probable the correlation they noticed exists (however weak the correlation may be).
Also, as someone who is very interested in poker behavior, I’d love to see similar studies be done. My main goal in writing these criticisms and suggestions was to emphasize that poker is complex, as is poker behavior. There are many behavioral factors in a seemingly simple hand of poker and taking these factors into account can make an experiment stronger and the results more conclusive.
Patricia Cardner, PhD, EdD, is a poker player and the author of Positive Poker, a book about the psychological characteristics of professional poker players. She had this to say about poker’s use in scientific studies:
“While researchers often have the best of intentions, it is difficult for them to fully understand the nuances of poker. Researchers who reach out to poker players for help can make more informed decisions about the research areas they choose to pursue, increase reliability and validity, and improve the overall quality of their results and conclusions.”
¹: Slepian, M.L., Young, S.G., Rutchick, A.M. & Ambady, N. Quality of Professional Players’ Poker Hands Is Perceived Accurately From Arm Motions. Psychological Science (2013) 24(11) 2335–2338.

Related

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

Posted in hand movement, Poker Tells, Psychology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

ครอบครัวทรัมป์พยายามฟื้นคืนอำนาจหลังจากพ้นโทษนักพนันกลับไปหาลาร่าทรัมป์


เผยแพร่เมื่อ: 15 กุมภาพันธ์ 2021, 11:43 น. Last updated: ก.พ. 15, 2021, 11:43 น. ตามคำทำนายของนักพนันทางการเมืองอดีตประธานาธิบดีโดนัลด์ทรัมป์พ้นผิดในวุฒิสภาด้วยข้อหาฟ้องร้องเพียงข้อหาเดียวที่เสนอโดยสภา ด้วยการฟ้องร้องครั้งที่สองที่อยู่เบื้องหลังเขาทรัมป์และครอบครัวของเขากำลังเตรียมที่จะฟื้นอำนาจทางการเมืองอีกครั้ง Lara Trump ได้พบกับ Eric Trump สามีของเธอที่งานการจากไปของพ่อตาเมื่อเดือนที่แล้วที่ Washington, DC เขาอาจจะกลายเป็นผู้นำในตำแหน่งที่ว่างต่อไปในวุฒิสภานอร์ทแคโรไลนา (ภาพ: The New York Times) ทรัมป์ออกจากทำเนียบขาวด้วยเรื่องอื้อฉาวอันเป็นผลมาจากการบุกโจมตีศาลากลางของสหรัฐอเมริกาเมื่อวันที่ 6 มกราคมซึ่งเป็นเหตุการณ์หายนะที่พรรคเดโมแครตอ้างว่าได้รับแรงหนุนจากประธานาธิบดีในขณะนั้น ตอนนี้หลุดพ้นจากคำฟ้องแล้วมีความรู้สึกตื่นเต้นในหมู่ค่ายทรัมป์ “รู้สึกได้รับกำลังใจจากผลการพิจารณาคดีเขาคาดว่าจะเกิดจากการจำศีลด้วยตนเองที่สโมสรของเขาในปาล์มบีชรัฐฟลอริดาและกำลังค้นหาวิธียืนยันอำนาจของเขาอีกครั้ง” จิลล์คอลวินจาก Associated Press เขียน สิ่งนี้อาจเริ่มต้นจาก Lara Trump ภรรยาของลูกคนที่สามของ Trump, Eric Trump นักพนันทางการเมืองเริ่มแสดงความไว้วางใจในอดีตผู้ผลิตรายการโทรทัศน์วัย 38 ปีที่กำลังมองหาที่นั่งในวุฒิสภาผ่านรัฐนอร์ทแคโรไลนาซึ่งเป็นรัฐที่เธอเติบโตมา Lara Trump Odds ในตลาดนอร์ทแคโรไลนาหุ้นพรรครีพับลิกันของพรรครีพับลิกันในนอร์ทแคโรไลนาประจำปี 2020 ถูกเป่าหลังจากที่พ่อตาของเธอพ้นผิด อัตราต่อรองในการวิ่งของเขาเพิ่มขึ้นจาก 36 เซนต์เมื่อสัปดาห์ที่แล้วเป็น 48 เซนต์ในวันนี้ Burr’s (R-NC) ลงมติประณามอดีตประธานาธิบดี Richard Burr เพื่อนของฉันทำให้ Lara Trump เกือบจะเป็นผู้สมัครที่แน่นอนสำหรับที่นั่งวุฒิสภาใน North Carolina เพื่อมาแทนที่เขา “Graham กล่าวในระหว่างการปรากฏตัวใน Fox News Sunday GOP โหวตให้ Burr ประณามทรัมป์โดยเรียกว่า” น่าตกใจ และน่าผิดหวัง” เกรแฮมแสดงการสนับสนุนผู้สมัครรับเลือกตั้งของลาร่าทรัมป์ในนอร์ทแคโรไลนา“ ผู้ชนะที่ยิ่งใหญ่ที่สุดของการพิจารณาคดีฟ้องร้องนี้ฉันคิดว่าคือลาร่าทรัมป์” เกรแฮมกล่าวเสริม“ ถ้ามันดำเนินไป … ฉันจะอยู่ข้างหลังเธอแน่นอนเพราะฉัน คิดว่าเธอเป็นตัวแทนของอนาคตของพรรครีพับลิกัน “เพื่อให้มีคุณสมบัติคนพื้นเมืองนอร์ ธ แคโรไลนาจะต้องมีถิ่นที่อยู่ในรัฐรัฐธรรมนูญของสหรัฐอเมริกากำหนดข้อกำหนดสามข้อสำหรับคุณสมบัติในการมีสิทธิ์เข้าประเทศวุฒิสภา: บุคคลต้องมีอายุอย่างน้อยสามสิบปี อายุเป็นพลเมืองสหรัฐอย่างน้อยเก้าปีและดำรงถิ่นที่อยู่ในรัฐเมื่อถึงเวลาเลือกตั้ง Don Jr. Eyeing Pennsylvania Il ค่ายของทรัมป์ยังคงโต้แย้งว่าเพนซิลเวเนียจัดการเลือกตั้งประธานาธิบดีปี 2020 ที่ไม่สมบูรณ์ การเปลี่ยนแปลงขั้นตอนการลงคะแนนเสียงในระหว่างการระบาดใหญ่ของ COVID-19 นั้นไม่ประสบความสำเร็จในศาลโดยตัวแทนของทรัมป์นี่อาจเป็นเหตุผลว่าทำไมจึงมีเสียงดังก้องอยู่ในกลุ่มคนที่ใกล้ชิดกับครอบครัวทรัมป์มากที่สุดเช่นเดียวกับในเพนซิลเวเนียโดนัลด์ทรัมป์จูเนียร์ อาจนึกถึงการวิ่งที่นั่น ดอนจูเนียร์มีความผูกพันกับรัฐในขณะที่เขาเข้าเรียนที่ Hill School ซึ่งเป็นโรงเรียนประจำเตรียมอุดมศึกษาของวิทยาลัยใน Pottstown ลูกชายคนโตของอดีตประธานาธิบดียังศึกษาที่มหาวิทยาลัยเพนซิลเวเนียในฟิลาเดลเฟียและดอนจูเนียร์กำลังพิจารณาลงสมัครรับเลือกตั้งเป็นวุฒิสมาชิกในเพนซิลเวเนีย วุฒิสมาชิก Pat Toomey (D-Pa) เป็นหนึ่งในวุฒิสภาพรรครีพับลิกันที่ลงมติประณามทรัมป์ เจ้ามือรับแทงในสหราชอาณาจักรมี Don Jr. ลงสมัครรับเลือกตั้งเป็นวุฒิสภาเพนซิลเวเนีย (1/1) นักเดิมพัน PredictIt มีความมั่นใจน้อยกว่ามากเนื่องจากขณะนี้ทรัมป์จูเนียร์ให้โอกาส 15% เท่านั้นในการวิ่ง

แทงบอล
บาคทร่า
คาสิโน
คาสิโนออนไลน์
แทงหวย

Posted in Novelty Betting, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WSOP Michigan FAQ

Online poker went live in Michigan in January of 2021, and it was only with one operator, PokerStars Michigan. Other licensed companies launched online casinos and sportsbooks, but they held back on the poker segment to begin with.

It was not long before the state showed its online poker potential: PokerStars MI has become the largest regulated online poker room in the States, with the average traffic of 400 players in the very first week.

This development could well have prompted other stakeholders to move their online poker plans up. WSOP.com is one: While the final launch date for WSOP MI is still up in the air, as the company is currently focused more on going live in Pennsylvania before the summer, it might not be too long of a wait.

WSOP is one of the largest and best-known brands in the poker world and the name behind the largest yearly tournament series taking place in Las Vegas and (as of late) online. The company will certainly want to establish a foothold in Michigan.

On this page, we bring answers and predictions for the launch of WSOP.com in Michigan. Some of the information is based off of what we know about the two rooms currently in operation, namely WSOP Nevada and WSOP NJ, and we will make sure to update the information here as we obtain it.

When will WSOP MI go live?

There is no definitive date for the launch of WSOP Michigan. The operator is currently divided between several fronts, putting a lot of effort towards the launch in Pennsylvania. A realistic timeframe would be a few months, but it is possible the operator moves the launch date up and surprises MI players. The operator seems set on launching before the end of 2021.

Do I have to be physically present in the state to access WSOP Michigan?

You need to be within the state borders to play for real money at WSOP MI. This is one feature that all US regulated sites have in common and there is no reason to think that things will be any different when WSOP.com launches in Michigan.

The operator uses geolocation to make sure players adhere to this rule, and trying to bypass it is grounds for having your account closed. Also worth noting is that the minimum age limit to legally play on WSOP.com is 21.

Will WSOP.com Michigan combine player pools with other states?

Creating interstate online poker compacts is currently work in progress, not just for WSOP but for poker operators in the US in general. WSOP.com aims to offer combined player pools at some point, but it is difficult to say when and if this will happen.

Right now, there is an ongoing battle with regards to the Wire Act interpretation and if it should apply to online poker. Things are currently looking good for poker players and operators, and if the trend continues, we will start to see more rooms combining their pools across states.

Since WSOP MI is set to launch later this year, it is not impossible that there will be more clarity on the matter by that time. So, in theory, the room might have combined pools from the get-go, although it is likelier that they will kick off catering to Michigan players only and potentially expanding later.

What kind of a welcome offer will there be for new players?

Looking at what the room offers at New Jersey and Nevada, players from Michigan are probably looking at a 100% welcome bonus up to the maximum of $1000.

Like most poker bonuses, you will not receive the full amount immediately, but you will need to unlock it by playing real money cash games and tournaments and gathering Action Player Points (APPs). The bonus is released as follows:

The initial $10 releases at the rate of $1 for every 10 APPs
You will unlock the next $50 by receiving $5 for every 50 APPs
The rest of the bonus releases at the rate of $10 for every 100 APPs

The timeframe to release the bonus is usually 60 days, so there is plenty of time to do it. Action Player Points are awarded based on the rake generated, as follows:

2 APPs for $1 paid in cash games (based on contributed rake)
2 APPs for every $1 paid in tournament fees

Will there any other rewards offered by WSOP MI?

WSOP Michigan will very likely feature their simple but rather generous Poker Rewards program. Action Player Points that you gather by playing real money games can be used for more than just to unlock bonuses.

These points can be turned into real money when you convert them to WSOP Points. The number of WSOP Points you can get from your APPs depends on your loyalty level:

Bronze: Achieve 200+ APPs in a month and get 4x WSOP Points’ multiplier.
Silver: 750+ monthly points & 10x WSOP Points’ multiplier.
Elite: Gather 1500+ APPs and enjoy 12.5x multiplier.
Champions Club: Based on the yearly number of points. Achieve 20,000 or more and get to the maximum multiplier of 16x.

You can exchange WSOP Points for cash on your account. The process is very simple and you can redeem the points at the rate of $1 for 100 WSOP Points. The minimum number of points you can convert is 1000.

What deposit methods will be available for WSOP Michigan players?

WSOP offers a good variety of deposit options for the players in other states, and it is likely that Michigan players will have access to the same or at least very similar array of deposit methods, which includes:

MasterCard, Visa, and Discover
PayPal
ACH
PayNearMe
In-person deposit at the cashier cage

Some of these options have been thoroughly tried and tested by players, and PayPal and ACH seem to be top picks. Of course, in-person deposits are always a good option if you happen to find yourself in the vicinity of the actual property.

Credit and debit cards are always touch-and-go in the US. Despite the fact the sites have licenses to offer online poker games, many banks still block gambling-related transactions by default, so there is no guarantee your card will work with WSOP MI.

Does WSOP have a land-based partner in Michigan?

WSOP still does not have a land-based partner casino in the state of Michigan, which is a crucial step in the process. Before they launch, they will either need to find a partner in the state or wait for interstate compacts to become available.

What cash games will WSOP MI offer?

The most popular game offered at WSOP.com is No Limit Hold’em, with stakes going up to $25/$50. Other available cash game tables include Pot Limit Omaha and Omaha 8, as well as some stud games.

The bulk of action happens at NLHE and PLO tables, though, and this trend is likely to keep at WSOP MI as well. If you prefer other variations, the action is usually scarce and mostly found at lower limits.

Will WSOP.com MI offer BLAST poker tournaments?

WSOP Michigan will likely offer BLAST games. These are four-handed sit and go tournaments featuring the hyper-turbo structure and offering a chance to fight for the prize that can go as high as 10,000x your buy-in.

This is an exciting format, not just because of the jackpot potential, but also because there is a timer set for every game. Once the time runs out, all players are forced to go all in every hand until there is just one player remaining holding all the chips.

Does WSOP offer any form of fast-fold poker?

There are no fast-fold tables of any sort currently available at WSOP.com. This may change by the time WSOP MI is ready to launch, but at this point in time, the room does not offer any quick fold variations.

Is WSOP.com software any good?

While there are better online platforms out there, WSOP.com has done a fine job with the desktop software. The company is not too keen on implementing regular updates, but the fact is that WSOP.com offers a nice design and a good range of options to personalize your playing experience.

There are a few different deck designs on offer and a solid selection of avatars to choose from. The actual play interface is fairly simple but it is clean and easy to use.

It is worth mentioning that WSOP.com and 888 are getting ready to roll out a brand new client called Poker 8. This should be a major improvement on the existing software.

The plan is to roll out Poker 8 in Pennsylvania first and then move to other states. Depending on when WSOP Michigan goes live, players might have the privilege to play on the new platform from day one.

Will I be able to play WSOP Michigan from my phone?

Right now, WSOP.com offers mobile apps for Android and iOS devices, so Michigan players wanting to play from their phones and tablets should experience no problems. The current app does come with certain limitations, though. For example, you can only play one table at any given moment.

This problem, as well as many other smaller issues, should go away with the launch of the Poker 8 platform, as it will cover the mobile segment as well.

Latest News on WSOP MI:

Read more on WSOP MI »

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

This Week in Poker Podcasts

Poker Fraud Alert Radio – 02/12/2021 – The Terrence and Mike Twitter Show

(Topic begins at 0:24:28 mark): The Heads Up Undercard – Landon Tice versus Bill Perkins…. (0:49:12): Terrence Chan, Mike McDonald get into Twitter battle over Pokershares bet on Tice/Perkins match…. (2:12:28): Update: Fired Bellagio dealer “Patches” lands on his feet, gets new job…. (2:25:10)

View the complete archives of Poker Fraud Alert in the directory →

Ep 246 – Forum On Monotone Flops (@FiveByFive)

This week, Jim Reid leads the panel through a forum post by our own @FiveByFive! While battling it out against each other in the nightly home game, the panel looks at five different types of hands we might find ourselves with in the big blind when we see a monotone flop and it checks through to the turn.

View the complete archives of Rec Poker Podcast in the directory →

Ep 245 – REC Room: HUD and Hand Review – Jim and Matt

Once a month a Premium member goes one-on-one with a member of the RECing Crew to break down a hand, talk strategy, or discuss how to otherwise get the most out of their poker experience! Email [email protected] if there’s a member of the RECing Crew that YOU’D like to connect with, and we’ll try to match you up! In this episode, we come back to part two of Jim and Matt in the REC Room, looking at the RecPoker HUD and reviewing some hands in PokerTracker4. We talk about HUDs at the beginning so the video version of this podcast will be more informative than the audio version – Sign up for a free Community account at rec.poker to watch the video versions of all our podcasts – and a lot more!

View the complete archives of Rec Poker Podcast in the directory →

February 12th, 2021 – Heads-Up Battles, Betting Controversies and Strategy

On this episode of the Tournament Poker Edge Podcast, Clayton wraps up the heads up battle between Daniel and Doug, discusses the betting controversy between Timex and Terrence Chan, answers a viewer tweet and of course gets in to some strategy.

View the complete archives of The Tournament Poker Edge Podcast in the directory →

Ep 245 – REC Room HUD And Hand Review – Jim And Matt

Once a month a Premium member goes one-on-one with a member of the RECing Crew to break down a hand, talk strategy, or discuss how to otherwise get the most out of their poker experience!

View the complete archives of Rec Poker Podcast in the directory →

#117 Greg Vail: Red Chip Poker Coach and Author of SCOOP! Winning High Low Concepts for the Hold’em Mind

Today’s guest on the Chasing Poker Greatness podcast is the author of SCOOP! Winning High Low Concepts for the Hold’em Mind volumes 1, 2, & 3 Greg Vail.Greg’s a Red Chip Poker Coach and cash game pro who specializes in the world of Big O and Omaha Hi-Lo.Greg’s poker career is split into two acts: The first act was from 2005-2010.

View the complete archives of Chasing Poker Greatness in the directory →

PokerNews Podcast: Doug Polk Discusses Win Against Negreanu; Interview w/ Scott Stewart

On the latest episode of the PokerNews Podcast, Sarah Herring, Chad Holloway, and Jeff Platt bring you all the latest news and highlights from the poker world. That includes talking to guest Doug Polk about defeating Daniel Negreanu in their highly-publicized heads-up duel. He shares thoughts on Negreanu’s play and tanking, explains some side action and coaching details, offers a take on how he sees himself as a HUNL player in today’s poker world, and tells listeners what’s next for him. In addition, they interview five-time WSOP Circuit ring winner Scott Stewart about his recent win in the bestbet Jacksonville Winter Open $2,000 Main Event, good for $177,817. Toss in stories about GGPoker applying for a Pennsylvania license, Twitter PokerShares drama between Terrence Chan and Mike “Timex” McDonald, Johnny Oshana winning the MSPT Poker Bowl V, and Sami Kelopuro taking down a hattrick of big buy-in online events in a single day, and it’s another great show of the PokerNews Podcast.

View the complete archives of PokerNews Podcast in the directory →

GPInterview – Matt Salsberg – Episode 4 – GPITHM Poker Podcast Network

On today’s pod, we welcome Matt Salsberg for his GPInterview. Matt reveals some very personal news on a recent health issue, reminisces about his WPT poker successes so far on the circuit and talks about life as a Hollywood writer and producer.

View the complete archives of GPITHM Podcast Network in the directory →

Should The Elite Pro Call It Off Heads Up?

Manig Loeser faces an all-in overbet in a big time online tournament. If he calls and wins he takes it down – how should he proceed?

FLOP: 2d Kd Js TURN: Qs RIVER: 5c

Loeser: Qd 9h Smyth: 2c 2s

For access to exclusive Poker Guys freerolls and other tournaments on Nitrogen Sports Poker Room, use this link to sign up: www.nitrogensports.eu/r/632610

***Our Book is NOW AVAILABLE! Get “How Can He Fold???” here: www.thepokerguys.net

View the complete archives of The Breakdown Podcast with The Poker Guys in the directory →

136 – Peter Clarke – The Philosophy of Poker

Whether you’re a seasoned player or just getting started, your biggest leaks at the table come from emotional decision making. Do you bring awareness and intention to every hand? Or do you make automatic plays based on your subconscious habits? Know the science. Know the numbers. Balance with logic. And catch yourself before you punt off your stack again! Your emotional leaks could be holding you back and costing your bankroll over time… In this episode, Peter Clarke, long-time online cash game coach and author of Poker Therapy, shares how he stays ahead of the game—by taking a philosophical and rational approach to solver GTO strategy. Click play to learn more! Click here to get the full show notes and resources from this week’s episode  

View the complete archives of The Mindset Advantage Podcast in the directory →

Doug Polk Joins the Show To Discuss Beating Negreanu for $1.2 Million

Lance Bradley and Donnie Peters return for a new episode of The Fives Poker Podcast, and this time the two are joined by a very special guest. Doug Polk stops by to discuss his challenge with Daniel Negreanu, winning $1.2 million, and what’s next for him.

View the complete archives of The Fives Poker Podcast in the directory →

CardsChat with Eli Elezra

On episode #24 of the CardsChat podcast we have the pleasure of welcoming Eli Elezra. A 4x WSOP bracelet winner and WPT title winner, Eli is best known as a high stakes cash game player and TV poker personality over the last three decades. Away from the felt, Eli has led a legendary life growing up in Israel and serving in the IDF’s Golani Brigade, and has had incredible adventures on fishing boats and driving taxis in Alaska before moving to Las Vegas. On this episode, we’ll get to know Eli Elezra the family man, the businessman, and the poker legend a little better.

View the complete archives of Cards Chat in the directory →

#116 Kenny Hallaert: Belgian Crusher with over $11mil in career earnings, including 2016 WSOP ME Final Table

Kenny (SpaceyFCB) Hallaert has cashed for over $10 million in his live and online poker careers combined.Even though he has yet to take down the elusive major live tournament, it’s easy to say he’s seen way more than his fair share of success on the green felt.

View the complete archives of Chasing Poker Greatness in the directory →

Effective Poker Study

The best way you can gain a competitive advantage over your opponents is to improve your studying. James and Chris give their take on what effective study in poker looks like. They discuss how to make studying more enjoyable, and how to make goals for your study sessions.

View the complete archives of Red Chip Poker in the directory →

Tactical Tuesday #13: Facing an Exotic Line with an Overpair & Maximizing Profit vs. Fishies

Tactical Tuesday goes back to its roots on this week’s episode with a pair of hand breakdowns brought to you by Coach Brad and his student Jon. The first hand comes from a recent $5/$10 session on Ignition where Jon faces an unexpected turn donk in a 3bet pot. The second hand is one posted in the hand history review section of Greatness Village by one of Coach Thomas’ students. If you’d like to potentially get one of your hands reviewed by Coach Brad on Tactical Tuesday sign up for the VIP Newsletter at: https://chasingpokergreatness.com/VIP Going VIP will also get you access to Poker Power Hour, a weekly group coaching session hosted by the coaches of Greatness Village.

View the complete archives of Chasing Poker Greatness in the directory →

The Bernard Lee Poker Show 02-09-21 with Guest Ronnie Bardah

2012 WSOP Bracelet Winner Ronnie Bardah joins Bernard Lee. 

View the complete archives of Bernard Lee Poker Show in the directory →

First Flag – David Lappin – Episode 13- GPITHM Podcast Network

Roland is joined by Unibet Ambassador David Lappin on today’s First Flag. The GPI Global Poker Award winner talks about the Dutch flag he captured in 2007 and reveals which flag remains the most important one he’s collected in his career.

View the complete archives of GPITHM Podcast Network in the directory →

Ep 244 – Ryan Laplante And Playing Live Again

Ryan Laplante joins us from his training site Learn Pro Poker to talk about playing live again in the pandemic era, what kind of tells he looks for in villains, and we go over a hand where Ryan soul-reads a foe to make a killer river call!

View the complete archives of Rec Poker Podcast in the directory →

98. Henry Lister on GTO vs Exploitative

Run it Once pro and high stakes poker player Henry Lister shares his thoughts on how GTO and exploitative play are related before going into how poker has made him the best version of himself.

View the complete archives of Carrot Poker in the directory →

The Chip Race – Season 14 Episode 4 – Ana Marquez Ryan Fee Martin Jacobson Roland Boothby

What a show we have for you this week as we welcome high stakes crusher and Upswing Poker founder Ryan Fee. We sit down with one of Spain’s greatest ever players, online and live beast Ana Marquez. We’ve got strategy with a WSOP MAIN EVENT champion as Martin Jacobson talks is through his most controversial ever spot, a hand versus Doug Polk from the ‘One Drop’ final table. Roland Boothby is here to discuss the GPI/THM’s new podcast network, including his new show ‘First Flag’. We’ve also got a news and results round-up from Ian Simpson.

View the complete archives of The Chip Race Poker Podcast in the directory →

244 – Steve and Daniel

Daniel’s day started in an unexpected way, with a call from a previous intimate acquaintance who asked for an out-of-the-ordinary favor. However perplexing that was, it did not stop Daniel from bringing his positive vibes and knowledge to join Steve in discussing more about stock trading, upcoming guests on the show, and Peruvian plant-induced spiritual experiences. You can get in touch with Steve Barton on Twitter here!

View the complete archives of Heads Up Poker Podcast in the directory →

SHORT STACK Crash Course | A Little Coffee with Jonathan Little

One of the many leaks that I see in poker players is not having the ability to adapt their strategy relative to their stack size. Many players will play the same way regardless of how many big blinds they have. ⁣ ⁣ It is vital that you are constantly changing your ranges depending on not …
SHORT STACK Crash Course | A Little Coffee with Jonathan Little Read More »The post SHORT STACK Crash Course | A Little Coffee with Jonathan Little first appeared on Jonathan Little.

View the complete archives of Weekly Poker Hand with Jonathan Little in the directory →

Did This Guy Make A Mistake By Moving In Against Ike Haxton?

It’s the final table of a big time online tourney, and Ike Haxton is in the mix. Is his opponent making a mistake against the poker wizard?

FLOP: 5c 6s Kd TURN: 8s RIVER: As

Ike: 6d6h Ramage: Js10sFor access to exclusive Poker Guys freerolls and other tournaments on Nitrogen Sports Poker Room, use this link to sign up: www.nitrogensports.eu/r/632610

***Our Book is NOW AVAILABLE! Get “How Can He Fold???” here: www.thepokerguys.net

View the complete archives of The Breakdown Podcast with The Poker Guys in the directory →

Episode 94 – Tournament Poker Bankroll Management and a Cashout Strategy

Welcome to Episode 94! MTT Coach Gareth James and Peak Performance Mindset Coach & Educator Dr. Tricia Cardner are back discussing all things poker strategy & mindset. After catching up on our latest activities, we turned to answering a bankroll question sent in by Kim who wants to hear our current thoughts on using a cash-out strategy while maintaining one’s roll. T

View the complete archives of Poker On The Mind in the directory →

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Ex-Broker Arrested for Taking $411K from Clients, Some Money Went to Casinos


Posted on: February 14, 2021, 10:02h. 
Last updated on: February 14, 2021, 10:07h.

Steve Bittenbender

Read MoreA debarred investment broker is out on bail after federal authorities charged him with stealing more than $400,000 from clients to pay personal debts, including money he owed casinos.
A former Long Island investment broker has been charged with stealing more than $400,000 from clients. Federal prosecutors said Apostolos Pitsironis used part if the money to pay off casino debts. (Image: Shutterstock)Apostolos Pitsironis, 52, faces up to 20 years in prison, according to a release from the US Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York. FBI agents arrested him Wednesday in Dix Hills on Long Island. He made his initial court appearance that same day.According to a complaint filed Tuesday by FBI Special Agent Rachel Cartwright, Pitsironis served as an advisor to an unnamed married couple for 10 years beginning in 2009. After he switched firms late in 2018, the couple moved their accounts to his new firm so he could continue to manage them.A January 2019 announcement in Newsday showed Janney Montgomery Scott LLC hired Pitsironis to be its first vice president located at its Melville office. Previously, he worked as a branch manager for Wells Fargo.Around that same time, authorities claim Pitsironis asked his clients for a $200,000 loan. They turned down his request.Nearly six months later, between May 2, 2019, and June 11, 2019, they allege he made 22 wire transfers from the victims’ accounts to one he and his wife controlled. In making the transfers, Pitsironis falsely said he received verbal approval to make the transfers.Financial advisors have a significant responsibility to appropriately manage the life savings of those who put their faith in them. Anyone who falls short on this front by engaging in illegal practices should, and will, be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law,” stated FBI Assistant Director-in-Charge William F. Sweeney, Jr. in a statement.Court records show Pitsironis posted the $200,000 bond on Wednesday.More Than $60,000 Went to CasinosCartwright claimed Pitsironis spent at least $62,402 at three casinos. He sent $40,502 to an unnamed Atlantic City casino, and then another $15,000 to a second casino in the New Jersey town.He also sent $2,000 to an unnamed casino in south Florida. Records indicate he also made more than $2,000 in payments toward a car and more than $1,700 to a landscaper.Pitsironis also allegedly made withdrawals totaling $18,600. That included a $4,900 disbursement at an ATM at the first unnamed Atlantic City casino.The funds became frozen about a week after the last transfers.“As alleged, the defendant stole hundreds of thousands of dollars from investors to pay his personal debts, violating the trust they had placed in him to manage their money safely and honestly,” Acting US Attorney Seth D. DuCharme said in a statement. “This Office is committed to protecting the investing public from corrupt financial advisors like the defendant who put greed before their clients’ best interests.”Bilking investors to pay off gambling debts or support a habit is not a new trend. Authorities have prosecuted several for operating Ponzi schemes to bankroll gaming sprees.Sports radio personality Craig Carton received a 42-month federal sentence after using $5.6 million of investors’ money meant for a ticket-reselling business to fuel a gambling habit. After serving about a year in prison, he is currently on home incarceration.Authority Banned Broker After CompliantThe Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) serves as a private regulatory authority over securities businesses. Its origins date back more than 80 years.FINRA’s BrokerCheck indicated a client filed a complaint on June 17, 2019, that Pitsironis transferred $411,000 out of their account without permission. The record indicates Janney Montgomery Scott settled the case in full.On June 19, records show that the firm terminated him after conducting its own review.On Sept. 9, 2019, the organization announced it barred Pitsironis from “associating with any FINRA member firm” in any position. In the ruling, FINRA stated Pitsironis accepted it “without admitting or denying” the accusations.From Sept. 6, 2019, to Feb. 26, 2020, six more clients filed disputes. All indicate the client loaned Pitsironis money, but he either was slow in repaying or did not pay at all. In some cases, funds came from clients’ individual retirement accounts and faced tax penalties without a timely repayment.Those six cases claimed damages totaling nearly $434,000. BrokerCheck says all parties settled the cases for nearly $370,000 combined.

แทงบอล
บาคทร่า
คาสิโน
คาสิโนออนไลน์
แทงหวย

Posted in Crime, Financial | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Nevada Gaming Control Board Explains Gov. Sisolak’s New Casino Occupancy Rules


Posted on: February 14, 2021, 04:57h. 
Last updated on: February 14, 2021, 05:01h.
Nevada gaming properties will see increased casino floor and entertainment capacity starting on Monday. The 35 percent occupancy cap on casino floors follows months of a 25 percent limit. In March, the casino floor cap will likely jump to 50 percent.
J. Brin Gibson, chairman of the Nevada Gaming Control Board, shown here. He will lead the effort to implement Gov. Steve Sisolak’s new easing of restrictions on crowd sizes at casinos. (Image: Las Vegas Review-Journal)Also, guidelines impacting casino showrooms were announced by Nevada Gov. Steve Sisolak (D) on Thursday, and later explained to Casino.org by the Nevada Gaming Control Board (NGCB).“Public gatherings that were limited to 50 people can go to 100 individuals or 35 percent fire code capacity starting Monday,” Michael Lawton, a senior research analyst at the NGCB, said in an email. “The number jumps to 250 individuals or 50 percent of fire code capacity on March 15.”He explained that there is not a standard size for casino showrooms. The rules for even larger casino gatherings are more complex.“Beginning March 1st, large gatherings will be capped at 20 percent of total fixed seated capacity with strict social distancing requirements,” Lawton said.“Venues associated with gaming licensees must submit plans to their local health districts for approval prior to submission to the Nevada Gaming Control Board for final approval,” Lawton explained.Most shows at Nevada casinos were cancelled as the capacity restrictions were ordered lower last year by Sisolak. They were made even lower in November.Gaming Control Board Conducts 23,560 Inspections Since JuneMeanwhile, the NGCB continues to conduct inspections at gaming properties. Between June 4, 2020 and Friday, the NGCB has conducted 23,560 health and safety inspections of Nevada’s licensed gaming properties, Lawton said.From last March 12 through last week, the NGCB  spent 92,611 hours on COVID-19 responses. “These inspections will continue,” Lawton said.Casinos need to cooperate in the process. Gaming properties must “continue to comply with … [Gov. Sisolak’s] directive,” Lawton said. “The Governor’s Office will be releasing large gathering plan approval guidelines in the coming days.”As of May 1, decisions about COVID-19 restrictions mostly will be left to local communities under the governor’s current scenario. In the case of gaming properties, local leaders will work with the NGCB and the Nevada Gaming Commission to set guidelines, Sisolak said last week.Also, in January Sisolak said Nevada will prioritize frontline casino and hospitality employees as essential workers for COVID-19 vaccines. “However, it’s still unclear where the workforce will fall in the current vaccination schedule,” Lawton said.Casino operators continue to await more details on Sisolak’s directives, but sound pleased with the easing of restrictions.“We are encouraged by the progress in easing Nevada’s capacity restrictions and will continue to follow Governor Sisolak’s directives, expanding capacity when and where it is possible,” a Caesars Entertainment spokesperson told Casino.org on Friday.“Our focus remains on the well-being of our team members, guests, and the communities we serve,” the Caesars’ statement adds. “We are optimistic for the future and fully committed to assisting the COVID-19 vaccination rollout in Nevada and every community in which we operate.”Sisolak Walks a Tightrope on Coronavirus, Economist SaysWhen asked about Sisolak’s new guidelines, Stephen M. Miller, director at UNLV’s Center for Business and Economic Research, told Casino.org that Sisolak saying he is walking a “tightrope” is a “good analogy.“And in the political world, the governor is performing without a net,” added Miller, who is also an economist. He additionally encouraged Nevada residents to get COVID-19 vaccines.Miller further explained that in the field of economics, decisions are made at the margin to optimize outcomes. Typically, marginal benefits are balanced with the marginal costs.“The governor’s team is trying to find the tradeoff that optimizes the social good,” Miller added. “By opening up [occupancy levels], economic benefits improve, but public health costs will surely rise.”Increasing casino floor capacity from the current level of 25 percent to 35 percent, and later to 50 percent were “calculated to achieve the best improvement in the economy with the least damage to public health in the short run,” Miller said.“But as everyone can realize the uncertainties and unknowns when implementing such policy decisions are troublingly high.”As of Saturday, Nevada saw 31 new COVID-19-related deaths and 813 new coronavirus cases. Numbers of cases are improved in the state compared to some earlier rates, Sisolak said.So far, Nevada has administered about 390,000 doses of the vaccine. These include both first and second doses.

แทงบอล
บาคทร่า
คาสิโน
คาสิโนออนไลน์
แทงหวย

Posted in Coronavirus, Regulation | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

January Hoops ช่วยให้ Indiana เผยแพร่การเดิมพันกีฬาที่ทำลายสถิติอีกหนึ่งเดือน


เผยแพร่เมื่อ: 14 กุมภาพันธ์ 2564, 04:15 น. Last updated: 14 ก.พ. 2564 03:15 น. Steve Bittenbender อ่านเพิ่มเติมการเติบโตของการพนันกีฬาของ HoSier State ยังคงดำเนินต่อไปในปี 2021 ซึ่งเป็นไปตามรายงานของ Indiana Gaming Commission ซึ่งเปิดเผยผลรวมการเดิมพันในเดือนมกราคมในวันศุกร์ Jaden Ivey ของ Purdue แซงหน้า Rob Phinisee ของ Indiana ระหว่างชัยชนะ 81-69 ของ Purdue เหนือ Hoosiers ที่ IU Assembly Hall เมื่อวันที่ 14 มกราคม เกมท่ามกลางคู่แข่งรายใหญ่ในรัฐช่วยให้รัฐสร้างเงินเดิมพันบาสเก็ตบอลได้มากกว่า 133 ล้านดอลลาร์ในช่วงเดือนนี้ตามรายงานของ Indiana Gaming Commission (ภาพ: Purdue Athletics) นักพนันได้เดิมพัน 348.2 ล้านดอลลาร์ในเดือนมกราคมเพิ่มขึ้น 11.2% จาก 313.1 ล้านดอลลาร์ที่รายงานในเดือนธันวาคม นอกจากนี้ยังมากกว่าสองเท่าของยอดรวมในเดือนมกราคม 2020 ที่ 170.8 ล้านดอลลาร์ นอกจากนี้ยังมากกว่าที่รัฐอินเดียนารายงานในเดือนพฤศจิกายนเกือบ 100 ล้านดอลลาร์ (251.4 ล้านดอลลาร์) จำนวนการพนันกีฬาก็เพิ่มขึ้นเช่นกันโดยมีรายได้ 29.3 ล้านดอลลาร์ 20.6% จาก 24.3 ล้านดอลลาร์ในเดือนธันวาคมนอกจากนี้ยังสูงถึง 127.1% เพิ่มขึ้นจาก $ 12.9 ผู้ประกอบการล้านรายได้รับรางวัลในเดือนมกราคม 2020 เนื่องจากการพนันกีฬาชนะมากขึ้นรัฐบาลของรัฐอินเดียนาก็ทำเช่นกันอัตรา 9.5% หมายความว่ารัฐบาลได้รับเงินภาษีเกือบ 2.8 ล้านดอลลาร์อินเดียนาเปิดเผยสถิติ จัดการทุกเดือนตั้งแต่เดือนกันยายนการพนันกีฬาเป็นสิ่งที่ถูกกฎหมายตั้งแต่เดือนกันยายน 2019 การเติบโตอย่างต่อเนื่องของอินเดียนาในการเดิมพันกีฬาในช่วงไม่กี่เดือนที่ผ่านมาถือได้ว่าน่าทึ่งโดยเฉพาะอย่างยิ่งเมื่อรัฐใกล้เคียงสองแห่งอนุญาตให้มีการพนันกีฬาบนมือถือในช่วงไม่กี่เดือนที่ผ่านมา ตลาดการพนันกีฬาที่ใหญ่เป็นอันดับสี่ของประเทศทางตอนเหนือ มิชิแกนเปิดตัวการพนันกีฬาออนไลน์ในช่วงปลายเดือนมกราคม TS รายงานว่าการเข้าชมการพนันกีฬาออนไลน์สูงที่สุดในประเทศในช่วงสุดสัปดาห์ที่เปิดทำการ อินเดียนาแสดงให้เห็นว่าทำไมถึงเป็นรัฐบาสเก็ตบอลเมื่อสิ้นสุดฤดูกาลฟุตบอลอินเดียนาจะมีช่วงเวลาที่ยากลำบากในการรักษาการเติบโตอย่างต่อเนื่องในเดือนกุมภาพันธ์ แต่มีสิ่งหนึ่งที่รัฐมีแผนที่จะทำ: แฟน ๆ ชื่นชอบบาสเก็ตบอลและสิ่งนี้ได้รับการพิสูจน์แล้วในเดือนมกราคม: ในเดือนมกราคม Hoosiers ได้จ่ายเงินจำนวน 133.2 ล้านเหรียญจากการเล่น Roundball เป็นการเดิมพันสูงสุดในหนึ่งเดือนของกีฬา ช่วยให้ Indiana มีทีมบาสเก็ตบอลวิทยาลัย Division I 10 ทีมและ Indiana Pacers ของ NBA นอกจากนี้หลายคนจากรัฐเคนตักกี้โอไฮโอและอิลลินอยส์ (ซึ่งไม่อนุญาตให้วางเดิมพันในวิทยาลัยของรัฐ) ข้ามเส้นแบ่งเขตเพื่อเดิมพันในทีมของพวกเขาด้วย ในการเปรียบเทียบฟุตบอลมีเงินเดิมพัน 77.6 ล้านดอลลาร์ มีการแข่งขันในฤดูกาลปกติของเอ็นเอฟแอลหนึ่งสัปดาห์รวมทั้งวันหยุดสุดสัปดาห์เพลย์ออฟสามครั้งซึ่งรวมถึงอินเดียนาโพลิสโคลท์ในรอบแรก ในระดับวิทยาลัยมีเกมเพลย์ออฟให้เดิมพันเช่นเดียวกับ Outback Bowl ซึ่งเป็นจุดเด่นของ Indiana Hoosiers IGC จะนับการเดิมพันแบบพาร์เลย์แยกจาก IGC นักเดิมพันมีรายได้ 86.1 ล้านดอลลาร์จากการเดิมพันหลายเหตุการณ์ในเดือนมกราคม นักพนันเดิมพันออนไลน์ใหญ่ในช่วงไม่กี่เดือนที่ผ่านมาการเดิมพันออนไลน์ได้ครอบงำ การวางเดิมพันบนโทรศัพท์และอุปกรณ์อื่น ๆ มีมูลค่ารวม 296.5 ล้านดอลลาร์หรือ 85.2% ของส่วนแบ่ง ออนไลน์คิดเป็น 84.1 เปอร์เซ็นต์ของการเดิมพันเงินสดในเดือนธันวาคม ตัวเลขจาก IGC แสดงให้เห็นว่าการเพิ่มขึ้นของแอพใหม่ในช่วงไม่กี่เดือนที่ผ่านมาไม่สามารถทำลายการพนันกีฬาออนไลน์ในรัฐได้อย่างแน่นอน อินเดียนามีการพนันกีฬาออนไลน์สี่รายการในเดือนมกราคม 2020 ตอนนี้พวกเขาเป็น 10 รายการที่มีให้บริการ DraftKings ทั่วทั้งรัฐได้เห็นการจัดการมากกว่าสองเท่าในหนึ่งปีจาก 66 ล้านดอลลาร์ในเดือนมกราคม 2020 เป็น 122.6 ล้านดอลลาร์ต่อเดือน FanDuel เปลี่ยนจาก 49.5 ล้านดอลลาร์เป็น 89.2 ล้านดอลลาร์ในช่วงเวลาเดียวกัน ในแง่ของรายได้ DraftKings ได้รับรางวัล 9.4 ล้านดอลลาร์ในขณะที่ FanDuel ทำรายได้ 8.2 ล้านดอลลาร์เมื่อเดือนที่แล้ว ในบรรดาผู้เข้ามาใหม่ BetMGM มีรายรับ 52.4 ล้านดอลลาร์และมีรายได้ 3.7 ล้านดอลลาร์ในเดือนมกราคม PointsBet ทำรายได้จากการเดิมพัน 13.5 ล้านดอลลาร์และมีรายได้รวม 1.4 ล้านดอลลาร์

แทงบอล
บาคทร่า
คาสิโน
คาสิโนออนไลน์
แทงหวย

Posted in Gaming Business, Mobile Gaming | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What You Need To Know About Live Dealer Casino Games


If you’re new to online gambling, starting out can be difficult with so many options out there. But, you can rely on those of us who have been in the industry for years to help ease you into the process and help you choose the best types of casino games for you. In this brief but detailed page, we’ll cover everything you need to know about live dealer games. This includes their pros and cons, as well as the specific types of live dealer games you’ll come across online. What are Live Dealer Games? As the name gives away, live dealer games are those you play against a real, live dealer instead of the computer. These options are still not available for actual poker games like Texas Hold’em or PLO, but you will find almost every house-banked game you can think of. Live dealer gaming is a unique part of the gambling industry. It combines different aspects such as real dealers, real casino tables, sophisticated streaming technology, and specially-designed casino studios to deliver the real casino experience right via your screen. The most obvious difference between traditional casino, online casino options, and live dealer games, is that the latter combines different aspects of both to provide a unique atmosphere you can’t find anywhere else. Since live dealer casino games are a fairly new technology, many players are still skeptical about their fairness. That said, these doubts are unfounded, as you don’t have to fear anything when playing live dealer tables. Much like brick and mortar venues, live online casinos also hold gaming licenses and conduct regular tests to ensure their games offer fair odds. Although the dealer can’t see you or any other player at the table, you can clearly see the dealer shuffling and dealing cards, throwing the roulette ball, etc. Pros and Cons of Live Dealer Casino Tables The live dealer technology is still relatively new and, as such, comes with unique benefits and drawbacks compared to electronic casino game variations. Even though the game rules are pretty much identical, the environment is entirely different, bringing a unique set of challenges to the table. With that in mind, you should be aware of the most significant pros and cons before you start playing these games, whether you enjoy live casino poker, baccarat, or any other game. Pros of Live Dealer Games We’ll start with the advantages of live dealer casino games first because they heavily outweigh the drawbacks. Live casino technology is truly a game-changer in the industry, mainly because it offers these great benefits: Real-time Live Dealer Experience – Live casino games allow you to enjoy the experience of going up against a real dealer directly from the comfort of your chair. This is probably the most significant advantage live dealer games have over all other forms of gambling, as you can feel like you are in the casino without being physically present. Convenience and Availability – A live dealer casino is available around the clock, and you can access it anywhere and anytime you want. Regardless of whether you’re a desktop, laptop, or mobile user, all you need are a stable connection and a powerful enough device, and you can carry your live gaming experience with you. No Waiting Time – When you walk into a land-based casino, you won’t always have a free spot at the tables waiting for you. Sometimes there are just too many players around, and you’ll have to wait for your turn. When playing live dealer casino games online, you won’t have such problems as there are always free spots. Cons of Live Dealer Casino Games Live casino games undoubtedly offer a long list of benefits and advantages compared to the standard casino options. But, like any other gambling option, live casino games also come with some pretty distinct disadvantages. Let’s take a closer look at the most notable ones: Generally Slower – When playing live casino games with other players, you can often run into those who are very slow when making their moves. Of course, there’s always a time limit during which the players must act. However, this can get frustrating if it happens too often during a single session. Technical Issues – Even if you have a powerful device and a stable 4G connection, you can experience technical issues from time to time. Since the games are streamed from a dedicated studio via a video link, problems such as choppy connections are expected occasionally. Higher Minimum Bets – Compared to electronic options, live casino games have higher minimum bet requirements. This is mainly because running live casino studios with real dealers is more expensive than regular online casino games. With higher stakes, live casino games aren’t for everyone and are not the best choice for beginners. Most Popular Live Casino Games Live dealer casino games have come a long way since their inception in the mid-2000s. The industry’s top software providers have done their part to recreate the most popular casino games in online live dealer format. Some of the games you can expect to find in a live casino are: Blackjack Baccarat Roulette Poker (Most often Casino Hold’em) With the above information in mind, we should note that not all live casino games are the same. The quality of your experience can vary significantly based on several factors. The most notable one to pay attention to is the software provider that offers a particular live casino game you want to play. Not all casino software companies are the same, as some are far better at developing live content than others. The best live casino software companies to seek out are Evolution Gaming, NetEnt, and Playtech. Should You Give Live Games a Go? Live dealer casino games are undoubtedly the way of the future in the gambling industry. They provide you with the real atmosphere of playing in a brick and mortar casino, with the extra convenience of not having to leave your house or travel anywhere to play your favorite games. Plus, you can also take advantage of the many live dealer bonuses most online casinos offer. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to try out live casino games is entirely on you. Keep in mind the pros and cons we shared with you above, and make sure to stick to our picks of live dealer software providers. We truly recommend you try out live dealer casino games if you’ve never done so before. No matter what game you decide to load up, one thing is sure: you’re guaranteed a gambling experience like no other.

หวยออนไลน์
เล่นหวยออนไลน์
ไพ่ออนไลน์
เว็บ คาสิโน
คาสิโน777

Posted in casino | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment